Teams

Sanderson/6.5/COMBO/18&O/RPAR

2025 Ruston Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women · 6.5 Ruston (18&0) Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-12vs McDonald/6.5/COMBO/18&O/RPARWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnh Le / Donna Wilburn vs Chelsea Pernici / Lauryn Brooks6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJennifer Sanderson / Barbara Johnson vs Tammy Roberts / April Easley6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarla Carter / Tina Otwell vs Krystal Corbett / Mary Moore4-6, 4-6
2025-10-05vs McDonald/6.5/COMBO/18&O/RPARWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmilie Tomlin / Barbara Johnson vs Chelsea Pernici / DeEtte Wick6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTiphanie Maxwell / Anh Le vs Kari McGuire / Lauryn Brooks6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarla Carter / Jennifer Sanderson vs Joan McMaster / Krystal Corbett6-2, 6-3
2025-09-28vs McDonald/6.5/COMBO/18&O/RPARWon 20
W#2 DoublesBarbara Johnson / Tina Otwell vs Lauryn Brooks / Clara Gregory6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCarla Carter / Donna Wilburn vs April Easley / Tammy Roberts2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-09-21vs McDonald/6.5/COMBO/18&O/RPARWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmilie Tomlin / Barbara Johnson vs DeEtte Wick / Chelsea Pernici6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnh Le / Cindy Gordon vs Joan McMaster / April Easley6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDonna Wilburn / Taylor Weeks vs Kari McGuire / Mary Moore6-3, 6-3
2025-09-14vs McDonald/6.5/COMBO/18&O/RPARWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnh Le / Taylor Weeks vs Chelsea Pernici / Krystal Corbett6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarla Carter / Kristi Williams vs Mary-Kyle McDonald / DeEtte Wick6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBarbara Johnson / Emilie Tomlin vs April Easley / Kari McGuire6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.5 Ruston (18&0) Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sanderson/6.5/COMBO/18&O/RPAR50141691
2McDonald/6.5/COMBO/18&O/RPAR0511428175

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Cindy Gordon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Donna Wilburn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Tina Otwell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Emilie Tomlin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Taylor Weeks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Tiphanie Maxwell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Jennifer Sanderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Carla Carter
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindy Gordon
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3
Donna Wilburn
14W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.10
Tina Otwell
16W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
3.5
Emilie Tomlin
13W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.91
Taylor Weeks
12W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.90
Tiphanie Maxwell
21W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
Jennifer Sanderson
35W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Carla Carter
16W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.