Teams

LLHE-Hession/Jetton

2025 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 8.5 Women 18s

14 players · average NTRP 4.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-10vs LTPE-Persinger/Jetton 18s 8.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPhebby Benton / Danielle Delancey vs Margaret Dlugos / Tracie Persinger1-6, 3-6
2025-10-03vs LYI-Chin/PeninsulaLost 01
L#1 DoublesSachi Denny / Danielle Delancey vs Lori Scherrman / Jennifer Ross4-6, 4-6
2025-09-26vs LTDU-Dudan/JettonWon 30
W#1 DoublesDawn Jennings / Danielle Delancey vs Amy Ward / Debbie Beam6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCheryl Woodruff / Stacy Agar vs Traci Dudan / Barbara Moore6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Davis / Dana Goodrich vs Naila Campbell / Jennifer Mautz6-1, 6-1
2025-09-19vs LTPE-Persinger/Jetton 18s 8.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesDana Goodrich / Lauren Hession vs Kathleen Milligan / Margaret Dlugos4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSachi Denny / Phebby Benton vs Tracie Persinger / Caroline Ray7-6, 6-1
2025-09-12vs LYI-Chin/PeninsulaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDana Goodrich / Laurie Cleveland vs Lori Scherrman / Jennifer Ross6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDawn Jennings / Danielle Delancey vs Yin Chee Chin / Elizabeth Foreman4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-09-05vs LTDU-Dudan/JettonWon 20
W#1 DoublesPhebby Benton / Elizabeth Schrand vs Amy Brandon / Cynthia Delay4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Davis / Sachi Denny vs Lola Terry / Jenny Yaudes4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-29vs LTPE-Persinger/Jetton 18s 8.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesPhebby Benton / Elizabeth Schrand vs Anya Balcerzak / Kari Andrews6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKim Molke / Stacy Agar vs Caroline Ray / Brenda Brewer6-1, 6-3
2025-08-28vs LYI-Chin/PeninsulaWon 20
W#1 DoublesStacy Agar / Phebby Benton vs Yin Chee Chin / KC Bywater5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFelicia Dean / Danielle Delancey vs Lori Scherrman / Kirsty Donaldson-Roach6-4, 6-3
2025-08-26vs LTDU-Dudan/JettonWon 30
W#1 DoublesCheryl Woodruff / Stacy Agar vs Traci Dudan / Amy Brandon6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLauren Hession / Dana Goodrich vs Barbara Moore / Jenny Yaudes6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLaurie Cleveland / Kim Molke vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Elizabeth Schrand
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.34
Cheryl Woodruff
published 4.5
4.33
Dana Goodrich
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.26
Dawn Jennings
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.26
Stacy Agar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.25
Felicia Dean
published 4.5
4.19
Sachi Denny
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.17
Courtney Rowe
published 4.5
4.15
Lori Woods
published
3.98
Danielle Delancey
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.94
Laurie Cleveland
published
3.77
Kim Molke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Phebby Benton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.74
Lauren Hession
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sachi Denny + Danielle Delancey4352% games+4.1% vs expected
Laurie Cleveland + Kim Molke3356% games+3.8% vs expected
Phebby Benton + Elizabeth Schrand19264% games+2.0% vs expected
Sachi Denny + Phebby Benton9164% games−1.8% vs expected
Sachi Denny + Elizabeth Schrand4360% gamesnot enough data
Danielle Delancey + Dawn Jennings6079% gamesnot enough data
Courtney Rowe + Dawn Jennings213 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Jennings + Phebby Benton303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Elizabeth Schrand
52W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Cheryl Woodruff
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
4.34
4.5
Dana Goodrich
91W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.33
4.5
Dawn Jennings
210W–84L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.26
4.5
Stacy Agar
76W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.26
4.5
Felicia Dean
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
Sachi Denny
145W–47L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Courtney Rowe
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
4.17
Lori Woods
18W–14L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Danielle Delancey
51W–28L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.98
Laurie Cleveland
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Kim Molke
38W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Phebby Benton
170W–72L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Lauren Hession
11W–15L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.