Teams

SFV - LLW TA Greatshot/S Ur & Shahriaree

2025 Adult Tri-Level 18 - SFV Summer · SFV Men's 3.0-4.0 (Low Tri)

15 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-08-23vs SFV - Scholland Garros/ Sumi ImWon 30
W#1 DoublesShih-hao James Pang / George Cheah vs Alex Song / SEUNG KIM7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWoo Kim / John Bragg vs Steve Choi / John Shin6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJose Ochoa / Daniel Bickerstaffe vs Joo Hyung Oh / Kwon S Yun6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV Men's 3.0-4.0 (Low Tri) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Steinway Huang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Manoj Parmar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Sang Ur
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Shih-hao James Pang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Arthur Chmielewski
published 3.5
3.48
Woo Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Kamron Shahriaree
published
3.44
Vic Kan
published
3.40
James Lee
published
3.29
George Cheah
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Geoff Heminway
published
3.16
John Bragg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Jose Ochoa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Jai Dicipulo
published
2.95
Daniel Bickerstaffe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Woo Kim + Shih-hao James Pang5066% games+22.0% vs expected
Sang Ur + Steinway Huang15560% games−7.9% vs expected
Manoj Parmar + Kamron Shahriaree3243% gamesnot enough data
James Lee + George Cheah224 matchesnot enough data
James Lee + Sang Ur224 matchesnot enough data
Manoj Parmar + Steinway Huang303 matchesnot enough data
Jose Ochoa + Kamron Shahriaree303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Steinway Huang
73W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Manoj Parmar
148W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Sang Ur
57W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
Shih-hao James Pang
23W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.56
3.5
Arthur Chmielewski
15W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Woo Kim
15W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.48
Kamron Shahriaree
51W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.46
Vic Kan
17W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
James Lee
25W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
George Cheah
16W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.29
Geoff Heminway
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
John Bragg
24W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.16
Jose Ochoa
17W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Jai Dicipulo
3W–14L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Daniel Bickerstaffe
17W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.