Teams

GSTL18/Chlada/RLTC

2025 Adult 18 & Over - GSTL · Adult Women 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-15vs GSTL18/Faust/StablesLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Bonnoitt / Denise Watts vs Nicole Harmon / Jenna McGary2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMarie Taylor vs Sarah Wood0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesFaith Langdale / Laura Oljeski vs Erica Umpierrez / Camilla Parker6-7, 2-6
2025-04-26vs GSTL18/Smith/PrestwickWon 40
W#1 DoublesEmily Moore / Janet Mathews vs Katherine Quinney / Lindsay Wallace6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRachel Berkey vs Kerry Schwanz6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDenise Watts / Sarah Bonnoitt vs Debbie Johnson / Kelle Siegmund6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Hill / Nicole Pearce vs Sandy Baker / Denise Lovorn6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2025-04-26vs GSTL18/Faust/StablesLost 13
L#1 DoublesLexi Chlada / Denise Watts vs Erica Umpierrez / Jenna McGary4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Oljeski / Marie Taylor vs Lorna Stribos / Nicole Harmon1-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesAmy Springs vs Nikola Faust3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNicole Pearce / Catherine Hill vs Holly Cox / Camilla Parker6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-05vs GSTL18/Smith/PrestwickWon 31
W#1 DoublesEmily Moore / Nicole Pearce vs Shital Patel / Natalie Rogers6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRachel Berkey vs Katherine Quinney6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMarie Taylor / Laura Oljeski vs Rosemary Folk / Linda Tangeman6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesFaith Langdale / Sarah Bonnoitt vs Denise Lovorn / Kerry Schwanz6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-29vs GSTL18/Faust/StablesLost 03
L#1 DoublesJanet Mathews / Emily Moore vs Jenna McGary / Nikola Faust6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarie Taylor / Laura Oljeski vs Lorna Stribos / Victoria Williams2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesFaith Langdale / Sarah Bonnoitt vs Holly Cox / Allison Stanford1-6, 3-6
2025-03-15vs GSTL18/Smith/PrestwickWon 50
W#1 DoublesEmily Moore / Denise Watts vs Lindsay Wallace / Sandy Baker6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRachel Berkey vs Kerry Schwanz6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarie Taylor / Laura Oljeski vs Debbie Johnson / Kelle Siegmund6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLexi Chlada vs Michael Coker6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNicole Pearce / Sarah Bonnoitt vs Linda Tangeman / Rosemary Folk6-1, 6-4
2025-03-08vs GSTL18/Faust/StablesLost 23
L#1 DoublesMarie Taylor / Laura Oljeski vs Jenna McGary / Sarah Wood0-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesRachel Berkey vs Elise Dozier6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNicole Pearce / Emily Moore vs Holly Cox / Victoria Williams6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesSarah Bonnoitt vs Erica Umpierrez1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDenise Watts / Catherine Hill vs Nikola Faust / Camilla Parker1-6, 1-6
2025-02-22vs GSTL18/Smith/PrestwickWon 41
W#1 DoublesEmily Moore / Janet Mathews vs Sandy Baker / Natalie Rogers6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRachel Berkey vs Kelle Siegmund6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMarie Taylor / Nicole Pearce vs Katherine Quinney / Shital Patel2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAmy Springs vs Kerry Schwanz7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLexi Chlada / Denise Watts vs Michael Coker / Stacy Hughes1-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Rachel Berkey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.08
Nicole Pearce
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.07
Lexi Chlada
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.93
Faith Langdale
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.89
Marie Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
3.79
Laura Oljeski
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Catherine Hill
published 4
3.68
Denise Watts
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.62
Amy Springs
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
Janet Mathews
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Bonnoitt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marie Taylor + Laura Oljeski6556% games+0.0% vs expected
Denise Watts + Lexi Chlada213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Berkey
13W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
4.46
Nicole Pearce
8W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.08
Lexi Chlada
10W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
4.07
4
Faith Langdale
11W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
Marie Taylor
16W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.89
Laura Oljeski
27W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Catherine Hill
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Denise Watts
16W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Amy Springs
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.62
Janet Mathews
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Bonnoitt
10W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.