Teams

KY/SOM/WHITIS

2026 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT SOMERSET · 3.0 WOMEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-30vs KY/SOM/WILLIAMSLost 04
L#1 DoublesKortney Anderson / Jenny Tharp vs Allison Sobieck / Melissa Harris0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesOlivia Matlin vs Marla Williams4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Webb / Sandy Paulson vs Charissa Kelly / Tamera Wright6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesNancy Whitis vs Katelyn Taylor2-6, 2-6
2026-05-29vs KY/SOM/WILLIAMSLost 03
L#1 DoublesJERI English / Lisette Garrett vs Charissa Kelly / Tamera Wright3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesOlivia Matlin vs Melissa Harris0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMegan Coffey vs Marla Williams0-6, 0-6
2026-05-28vs KY/SOM/WILLIAMSLost 12
W#1 DoublesSandy Paulson / Olivia Matlin vs Tamera Wright / Katelyn Taylor7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNancy Whitis vs Melissa Harris0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJERI English / Lisette Garrett vs Allison Sobieck / Marla Williams0-6, 2-6
2026-05-27vs KY/SOM/WILLIAMSLost 13
L#1 DoublesMegan Coffey / Nancy Whitis vs Allison Sobieck / Tamera Wright4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKortney Anderson vs Melissa Harris7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJERI English / Amanda Webb vs Charissa Kelly / Katelyn Taylor0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesOlivia Matlin vs Marla Williams2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Olivia Matlin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.85
Sandy Paulson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Lisette Garrett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
Jenny Tharp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Nancy Whitis
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.65
Amanda Webb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
JERI English
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kortney Anderson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Megan Coffey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Olivia Matlin
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Sandy Paulson
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Lisette Garrett
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Jenny Tharp
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Nancy Whitis
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Amanda Webb
1W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.65
JERI English
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
Kortney Anderson
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Megan Coffey
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.