Teams

MARIN TC 40AM3.5A

2021 ADULT 40 & Over · Men's 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2021-08-15vs TIBURON PEN C 40AM3.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesDerek Boorse / David Neagle vs Geoff Howard / Shannon Phillips6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-08-05vs NOVATO TC/PIONEER PK 40AM3.5BWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Neagle / Derek Boorse vs Tim Sullivan / Barry Richter6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Tassos Papadimos
published
3.49
Vladimir Matyurin
published
3.46
Elliott Magnuson
published 3.5
3.41
Jeff Loebbaka
published
3.35
Derek Boorse
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.35
David Hartwell
published 3.5
3.27
Mark Clem
published
David Neagle
published 3.5
3.22
Gervais Tompkin
published 3.5
3.18
Babak Jamasbi
published 3.5
3.09
Andrew Fremier
published 3.5
2.75
George Jackson
published 3
Lyle Cowen
published
Michael Swezy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elliott Magnuson + Jeff Loebbaka3356% gamesnot enough data
Elliott Magnuson + Mark Clem213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tassos Papadimos
12W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%18%82%
3.62
Vladimir Matyurin
7W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Elliott Magnuson
9W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%61%39%
3.46
Jeff Loebbaka
6W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%76%24%
3.41
4
Derek Boorse
137W–176L career · 2 lines in 2021
88%12%<1%
3.35
3.5
David Hartwell
10W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
Mark Clem
5W–8L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
David Neagle
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Gervais Tompkin
3W–8L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Babak Jamasbi
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Andrew Fremier
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
George Jackson
5W–8L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
Lyle Cowen
2W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Swezy
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.