Teams

SIERRA SPORT 55AM7.0A

2026 ADULT 55&Over · Men 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-22vs FIG GARDEN 55AM7.0AWon 20
W#1 DoublesTim Garver / Brent Wong vs Mike Purtell / Russ Roberts3-6, 5-5
W#2 DoublesJD Perry / Chris Schreiber vs Albert Rollema / Paul Miller7-5, 6-1
2026-05-19vs FIG GARDEN 55AM7.0ALost 12
L#1 DoublesSarkis Banipalsin / Lawrence Hotz vs David Brand / Albert Rollema6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJohn Stratigos / Tim Garver vs David M Williams / John Farrell4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJD Perry / Jeff Klippert vs Mike Purtell / Bryan Wagner3-6, 2-6
2026-05-11vs FIG GARDEN 55AM7.0ALost 12
W#1 DoublesLawrence Hotz / Brent Wong vs John Farrell / David Brand7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJesse Duran / Chris Rose vs Albert Rollema / Paul Harrington1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTim Garver / John Stratigos vs Will Lyles / Russ Roberts7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-05vs FIG GARDEN 55AM7.0ALost 03
L#1 DoublesSarkis Banipalsin / Brent Wong vs David Brand / John Farrell2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLawrence Hotz / Chris Rose vs David M Williams / Russ Roberts2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChris Schreiber / Prisco Ramirez vs Paul Harrington / Mike Purtell2-6, 4-6
2026-04-27vs FIG GARDEN 55AM7.0ALost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Stratigos / Jesse Duran vs David Brand / Russ Roberts3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJeff Klippert / JD Perry vs David M Williams / Daniel Conniff7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChris Rose / Lawrence Hotz vs Dan Rhoads / Paul Miller6-4, 6-3
2026-04-13vs FIG GARDEN 55AM7.0AWon 21
W#1 DoublesLawrence Hotz / Brent Wong vs Paul Harrington / Mike Purtell6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPrisco Ramirez / Chris Schreiber vs Daniel Conniff / Paul Miller0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesManny Reyes / Chris Rose vs Mark Benscheidt / Bryan Wagner6-2, 6-4
2026-04-07vs FIG GARDEN 55AM7.0ALost 12
L#1 DoublesSarkis Banipalsin / Manny Reyes vs David M Williams / David Brand3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPrisco Ramirez / Vince Taylor vs Mike Purtell / Paul Harrington6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJD Perry / Chris Schreiber vs Mark Benscheidt / Bryan Wagner2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-30vs FIG GARDEN 55AM7.0AWon 21
L#1 DoublesPrisco Ramirez / Brent Wong vs Paul Harrington / Russ Roberts2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesChris Rose / Lawrence Hotz vs Bryan Wagner / Mark Benscheidt6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJD Perry / Jeff Klippert vs Kent Hagen / Paul Miller6-4, 6-1
2026-03-24vs FIG GARDEN 55AM7.0ALost 03
L#1 DoublesJesse Duran / Lawrence Hotz vs David M Williams / John Farrell7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJD Perry / Vince Taylor vs David Brand / Daniel Conniff7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChris Rose / John Stratigos vs Will Lyles / Dan Rhoads7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2026-03-16vs FIG GARDEN 55AM7.0ALost 12
L#1 DoublesChris Rose / Manny Reyes vs John Farrell / David M Williams2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJD Perry / Jeff Klippert vs Paul Harrington / Russ Roberts2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSarkis Banipalsin / Brent Wong vs Kent Hagen / Paul Miller6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings52 teams · Men 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GLTF/SAN FRAN ST U 55AM7.0A9126410162
2WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM7.0A9126415217
3PINOLE PK 55AM7.0A9124616217
4MT TAM RC 55AM7.0A9122820199
5RAFAEL RC 55AM7.0A9122821202
6WIKIUP R SC 55AM7.0A9122821227
7JOHNSON RANCH 55AM7.0A9122822250
8GOLD RIVER RC 55AM7.0A9123723260
9SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 55AM7.0A8225515193
10PLEASANTON 55AM7.0A7321921231
11SCOTT VALLEY 55AM7.0A73201025252
12MARIN TC 55AM7.0A73191128246
13UNIVERSITY CLUB PA 55AM7.0A73191128232
14COASTSIDE TA/HALF MOON BAY HS 55AM7.0A73191128251
15LANEY TA/ALAMEDA HS 55AM7.0A73191128267
16BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 55AM7.0A73181229265
17FIG GARDEN 55AM7.0A73191130255
18VILLAGES GCC 55AM7.0A64191126243
19CHABOT CANYON 55AM7.0A64181229264
20MORGAN HILL TC 55AM7.0A55181227249
21SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK 55AM7.0A55171331259
22PENINSULA TC 55AM7.0A55181232275
23DANVILLE TC/MONTE VISTA HS 55AM7.0A55141636297
24FLAMINGO 55AM7.0A55131737266
25FOOTHILLS TandS 55AM7.0A55121839298
26CROW CANYON CC 55AM7.0A55141640315
27ALMADEN VAC 55AM7.0A55131741297
28NOVATO TC/PIONEER PK 55AM7.0A46141636275
29HARBOR PT 55AM7.0A46131736274
30LOS GATOS SR 55AM7.0A46131737273
31WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM7.0B46141640299
32FOSTER CITY TC/EDGEWATER PK 55AM7.0A46102041267
33RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 55AM7.0A46102042304
34MILLBRAE RC 55AM7.0A46111943295
35LAGUNA CREEK 55AM7.0A37141636266
36GLTF/GOLDMAN TC 55AM7.0A37121838261
37BROADSTONE RC 55AM7.0A37121841305
38CLAREMONT R and S 55AM7.0A37131741314
39BAY TREES PK 55AM7.0A37111942308
40ROUND HILL CC 55AM7.0A37102042304
41SIERRA SPORT 55AM7.0A37111943320
42BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA 55AM7.0A37102044326
43SILVER CREEK 55AM7.0A3792145316
44TIBURON PEN C 55AM7.0A3782245299
45OLYMPIC 55AM7.0A3772348320
46DIAMOND HILLS 55AM7.0A3782251329
47CUPERTINO TC/CUPERTINO SC 55AM7.0A2892146327
48PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM7.0A2882248319
49PETALUMA TA/CASA GRANDE HS 55AM7.0A19102043297
50MARIN CC 55AM7.0A1992145316
51CANON S and TC 55AM7.0A1982247317
52RIO DEL ORO 55AM7.0A1942652337

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Brent Wong
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.34
Lawrence Hotz
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.18
John Stratigos
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
Jesse Duran
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Chris Rose
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.98
Sarkis Banipalsin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
JD Perry
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Jeff Klippert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Prisco Ramirez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Tim Garver
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Vince Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Klippert + JD Perry134 matchesnot enough data
John Stratigos + Jesse Duran213 matchesnot enough data
Brent Wong + Lawrence Hotz303 matchesnot enough data
Chris Rose + Lawrence Hotz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brent Wong
9W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Lawrence Hotz
6W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
John Stratigos
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Jesse Duran
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Chris Rose
13W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Sarkis Banipalsin
2W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.98
JD Perry
4W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jeff Klippert
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Prisco Ramirez
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tim Garver
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vince Taylor
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.