Teams

Landry/18/5.5/Combo/WD/Beaver

2026 LAF Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day · 5.5 Laf (18&O) Women Day

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 16 11:00 AM
Beaver Park
Sep 23 11:00 AM
Beaver Park
Sep 30 11:00 AM
Beaver Park
2026-08-26vs Painter/18/5.5/WD/REDSWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrittany Landry / April Ledet vs Marissa Painter / Angelle Hollier3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKalin Marino / Kristi Guillotte vs Arlene Dupuis / Alexis DeJean6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEmily Jordan / Mackenzie Hebert vs Mary McCullough / Brenda Venable6-0, 6-1
2026-08-19vs Boudreaux/18/5.5/Combo/WD/BeaverWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Jordan / Brittany Landry vs Lenisse Robertson / Kimberly Fontenot6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMackenzie Hebert / Renee Langlinais vs Bobbie Chambers / Gabrielle Boudreaux6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKristi Guillotte / Jennifer Daigle vs Liz Godwin / Melanie Hoffpauir4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 5.5 Laf (18&O) Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Landry/18/5.5/Combo/WD/Beaver1030119
2Ezell/18/5.5/Combo/WD/CC1021426
3Painter/18/5.5/WD/REDS0112423
4Boudreaux/18/5.5/Combo/WD/Beaver0103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Emily Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.60
Renee Langlinais
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.41
Mackenzie Hebert
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.31
April Ledet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Jennifer Daigle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kalin Marino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kristi Guillotte
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Jordan
10W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%11%89%
2.67
Renee Langlinais
9W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%23%77%
2.60
Mackenzie Hebert
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%73%27%
2.41
2.5
April Ledet
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Jennifer Daigle
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kalin Marino
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kristi Guillotte
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.