Teams

OC LPC - Kristen

2022 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 4.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.42 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-12-10vs OC LPC - BlancoWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristen Hoppe / TRAM LY vs Anne Nicholson / Sabrina MacLachlan6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSally Namie / Christina Catipay vs Laurie Rhode / Mandy Cuan6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTina Mortensen / Karissa Do vs Misty Kolchakian / Deann McCormick6-2, 6-4
2022-11-12vs OC LPC - BlancoWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristina Catipay / TRAM LY vs Laura McManus / Elisabeth Marks6-3, 6-3
2022-11-05vs OC LLW Los Cab - TracyLost 02
L#1 DoublesTina Mortensen / TRAM LY vs Danielle D'Amico / Jena Roghair2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKirtine Yang / Karissa Do vs Robin Monk / Jinna Johnson3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesTina Mortensen / Christina Catipay vs Chi Rauen / Liz Rapoza6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Kristen Hoppe
published
4.37
TRAM LY
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.30
Dana Kim
published 4.5
4.11
Kirtine Yang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.07
Christina Catipay
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.07
Miwa Ishisaka
published
3.96
Karissa Do
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Sally Namie
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Catipay + TRAM LY7163% gamesnot enough data
Christina Catipay + Kirtine Yang1438% gamesnot enough data
Christina Catipay + Karissa Do033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Hoppe
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
4.44
5
TRAM LY
139W–109L career · 3 lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
4.37
4.5
Dana Kim
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.30
4.5
Kirtine Yang
71W–51L career · 1 line in 2022
19%81%<1%
4.11
4.5
Christina Catipay
136W–105L career · 3 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
4.07
Miwa Ishisaka
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
4.07
4
Karissa Do
90W–75L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Christina Bennett
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sally Namie
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.63
Stella Nguyen Bezabeh
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.