Teams

Babcock/Memphis

2023 Adult 40 & Over-Memphis · 3.0 Women 40 & over

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 40 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Susan Charping
published
2.98
Elizabeth Babcock
published
2.98
Casey Tidwell
published 3
2.93
Jennifer Muhlbauer
published
2.93
Tricia Bergeron
published
2.91
Janine Lammel
published
2.77
Julie Umansky
published
2.77
Ann Ray
published 3
2.76
Jill Bishop
published
Andrea Harano
published 3
2.74
Kim Pappas
published
2.71
Jamie Hunt
published
2.60
Laura Luckett
published
2.29
Niki Shaheen
published
Sara Albanese
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Bishop + Janine Lammel4155% gamesnot enough data
Julie Umansky + Jamie Hunt134 matchesnot enough data
Tricia Bergeron + Susan Charping314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Charping
15W–32L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.04
Elizabeth Babcock
17W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Casey Tidwell
13W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
2.98
Jennifer Muhlbauer
24W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.93
Tricia Bergeron
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
Janine Lammel
11W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.91
Julie Umansky
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Ann Ray
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
Jill Bishop
18W–14L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Andrea Harano
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Pappas
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
2.74
Jamie Hunt
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
Laura Luckett
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
2.60
Niki Shaheen
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
0%93%7%
2.29
Sara Albanese
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.