Teams

Colliers Reserve / Teller

2026 Collier Adult 65 & Over Winter · 7.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-02vs Island Walk / SchmidtWon 20
W#1 DoublesBetty Sayad / Elisabeth Teller vs Brenda Bensmiller / Sara Martineson3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Schultz / Monica Walsh vs Elise Kauder / Jeanne Morgenstern6-2, 6-4
L#1 DoublesElisabeth Teller / Lynn Lauck vs Lynn Damico / Celeste Michel4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesBetty Sayad / Nancy Schultz vs Katherine MacWilliams / Mercedes Baumann6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Phelps / Ann Kremer vs Deborah Paller / Sherry Jouannet3-6, 6-7
2026-02-16vs Island Walk / SchmidtWon 21
W#1 DoublesLynn Lauck / Elisabeth Teller vs Michelle Maggal / Brenda Bensmiller6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnn Kremer / Betty Sayad vs Elise Kauder / Patty McManus6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Phelps / Monica Walsh vs Linda Santo / Sue Schmidt6-1, 6-3
2026-02-09vs Cambier / SouthallWon 21
W#1 DoublesLynn Lauck / Betty Sayad vs Lorraine Kaplan / Brenda Smith7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Kremer / Elisabeth Teller vs Jill Chamberlain / Lisa Vivori6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMarion Malone / Nancy Schultz vs Linda Berson / Josee Theriault7-5, 6-3
2026-02-02vs Marco YMCA / CorreaLost 03
L#1 DoublesElisabeth Teller / Lynn Lauck vs Ana Cecilia Isaza / Pattie Yergler0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Phelps / Valerie Barrett vs Deb Dorsey / Jodi Schaufus4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMonica Walsh / Jeannette Licht vs Monica Erne / Pamela Ginzburg3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesBetty Sayad / Ann Kremer vs Katherine MacWilliams / Mercedes Baumann6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeannette Licht / Nancy Schultz vs Lynn Damico / Celeste Michel3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesValerie Barrett / Marion Malone vs Elsie Jerozal / Deborah Paller3-6, 4-6
2026-01-19vs Players Club / FreemanLost 12
W#1 DoublesLynn Lauck / Elisabeth Teller vs Mary Gorte / Ann McDonald2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesValerie Barrett / Susan Phelps vs Karen Terzano / Lisa McNichol1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Schultz / Marion Malone vs Beth Kropko / Sharon Oppenheimer3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-01-12vs Sterling Oaks/ GlobermanWon 21
W#1 DoublesLynn Lauck / Elisabeth Teller vs Ilene Flack / Ann Johnston7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBetty Sayad / Nancy Schultz vs Cheryl OConnor / Cheryl Schroer6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAnn Kremer / Monica Walsh vs Val Bischof / Kathleen Donnalley4-6, 2-6
2026-01-05vs Hammock Bay / CurrieWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Phelps / Betty Sayad vs Ricki Giersch / Laraine Segar4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLynn Lauck / Elisabeth Teller vs Cathy Miles / Cathlin Thompson7-6
W#3 DoublesAnn Kremer / Marion Malone vs Gloria Anderson / Cindy Jannetty6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Betty Sayad
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.30
Ann Kremer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Lynn Lauck
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.19
Elisabeth Teller
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jeannette Licht
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Marion Malone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Monica Walsh
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Nancy Schultz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Phelps
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Valerie Barrett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elisabeth Teller + Lynn Lauck422852% games+2.0% vs expected
Valerie Barrett + Nancy Schultz3548% gamesnot enough data
Susan Phelps + Valerie Barrett224 matchesnot enough data
Elisabeth Teller + Betty Sayad224 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Schultz + Betty Sayad224 matchesnot enough data
Susan Phelps + Betty Sayad213 matchesnot enough data
Valerie Barrett + Elisabeth Teller123 matchesnot enough data
Valerie Barrett + Betty Sayad033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Betty Sayad
7W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Ann Kremer
9W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Lynn Lauck
171W–112L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Elisabeth Teller
75W–65L career · 8 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.19
Jeannette Licht
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marion Malone
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Monica Walsh
2W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Schultz
46W–57L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Phelps
119W–117L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Valerie Barrett
57W–71L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.