Teams

TOC.Smyth

2022 CTRL Fall Singles 40 & Over · Fall Singles 40 & Over 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-30vs TOC.IrishSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMary Jo Dunnington vs Emily Childs6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSuzanne Jeska vs AnneSophie Dorey2-6, 1-6
2022-11-18vs TOHS.RiderWon 10
W#3 SinglesMary Jo Dunnington vs Karen Reynders6-2, 6-1
2022-10-19vs TOC.IrishWon 10
W#3 SinglesCarolina Robayo vs Lusia Li6-4, 7-5
2022-10-11vs LOCH.PeltSplit 11
W#2 SinglesMary Jo Dunnington vs Ana Maria Fernandez Serrat6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesSuzanne Jeska vs Sharon Poindexter2-6, 1-6
2022-10-05vs PW.MartinSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCarolina Robayo vs Dale Martin4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesCheryl Smyth vs Jennifer Hensley7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2022-09-21vs TOHS.RiderLost 02
L#1 SinglesMary Jo Dunnington vs Allyson Schneider3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 SinglesCheryl Smyth vs Karen Reynders2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Mary Jo Dunnington
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.48
Sarah Franks
published
3.31
Berna Tareen
published 3.5
3.30
Suzanne Jeska
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Carolina Robayo
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.91
Cheryl Smyth
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.87
Sheza Healey
published
Cindy Bohlin
published
Laura Rendon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Smyth + Suzanne Jeska314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mary Jo Dunnington
256W–119L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.58
Sarah Franks
79W–39L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Berna Tareen
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Suzanne Jeska
170W–105L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Carolina Robayo
145W–190L career · 2 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.15
3
Cheryl Smyth
212W–231L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
Sheza Healey
13W–27L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
Cindy Bohlin
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Rendon
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.