Teams

HCC Cade

2026 Valley Adult Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 - 10.0 · 8.0 Valley Mixed Doubles

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-13vs Harlingen JPLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarson Wick / Mary Scaief vs Toni Ibarra / Leo Cantu4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesPaula Fields / Dalton Mann vs Anica Diaz / Diego Salazar6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRuben Garza / Natalie Leal vs Juan Sauceda / Ena Capucion6-1, 6-1
2026-07-30vs Brownsville WilliamLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarson Wick / Mary Scaief vs Monica Aguilar / William Taliancich1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNatalie Leal / Dalton Mann vs Esli Campos / Judith Elena Saenz Figueroa3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRuben Garza / Paula Fields vs Guillermo Caracheo / Rachel Kram6-4, 6-3
2026-07-30vs Harlingen RamiroWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarson Wick / Mary Scaief vs Ramiro Gomez / Kayla Garcia6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRuben Garza / Elizabeth Scaief vs Justin Rubio / Julianne Martinez6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDalton Mann / Natalie Leal vs Jacob Leal / Lorena Guerra6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-30vs Harlingen GavinWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarson Wick / Mary Scaief vs Tabitha Torres / Francisco Mendoza6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPaula Fields / Dalton Mann vs Jaylynn Sanchez / Moises Alcocer6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0 Valley Mixed Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Brownsville William4093773
2HCC Cade2284982
3Harlingen Gavin134817120
4Harlingen Ramiro0421021141

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Mary Scaief
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Elizabeth Scaief
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Carson Wick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Dalton Mann
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Paula Fields
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Natalie Leal
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ruben Garza
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Scaief + Carson Wick4448% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Scaief
32W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
Elizabeth Scaief
24W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Carson Wick
11W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Dalton Mann
6W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Paula Fields
27W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.52
Natalie Leal
21W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Ruben Garza
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.