Teams

El.Merritt18A

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.57 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-22vs Me.George18ALost 02
L#1 DoublesAlison Uthe / Ashley Gaylord vs Christine Hunt / Whitney Leab1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Coyne / Lee Veit vs Erica Jackson / Dorothy Nance3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-04-17vs Je.Dysart18ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlison Uthe / Christina Allen vs Lauren Margulies / Sarah Bell4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLee Veit / Yvonne Barrow vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-08vs Je.Fogleman18AWon 10
W#2 DoublesLee Veit / Ramsay Younger vs Holly Camak / Jennifer Fogleman2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-03-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesLee Veit / Alison Uthe vs Lori Jones / Jessica Phillips3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-03-18vs An.Jones18ALost 01
L#1 DoublesAlison Uthe / Alison Anderson vs Terry Perrone / Deb Lanier2-6, 3-6
2025-03-04vs Cr.Smith18ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesLee Veit / Julia Kerr vs Anne Elizabeth Harrell / Kristen Welsh4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Merritt / Alison Uthe vs Amanda Dawson / Mandi Chappell6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Celeste Chapman
published 4
3.46
Alison Uthe
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.32
Ashley Gaylord
published 3.5
3.31
Lee Veit
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.22
Julie Coyne
published
3.21
Christina Allen
published 3.5
3.19
Yvonne Barrow
published
3.19
Harriet Mills
published 3.5
3.11
Jillian Good
published
3.10
Julia Kerr
published
3.04
Ihrie Wood
published 3.5
3.02
Ramsay Younger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lee Veit + Alison Uthe3353% gamesnot enough data
Julia Kerr + Christina Allen314 matchesnot enough data
Christina Allen + Alison Uthe224 matchesnot enough data
Julie Coyne + Jillian Good123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Celeste Chapman
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
4.04
3.5
Alison Uthe
76W–61L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Ashley Gaylord
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Lee Veit
83W–74L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Julie Coyne
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Christina Allen
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Yvonne Barrow
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Harriet Mills
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Jillian Good
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
Julia Kerr
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Ihrie Wood
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Ramsay Younger
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.