Teams

F5 CCV Bartzen

2024 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Weeknight Women · Richmond Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Weeknight Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-21vs C4 Belmont - ColginWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelissa Mauck / Laura West Hatcher vs Lee Moore / Jane Taft6-2, 7-6
2024-08-15vs A1 Hermitage-WalshLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Bencks / Melissa Mauck vs Marykay Stainback / Judi Baker4-6, 4-6
2024-08-06vs Mid-Atlantic/Kampinga/55&Over8.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTeresa Whitworth / Mary Bartzen vs Rochelle Purmasir / Leanne Jones1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Moore / Leemore Burke vs Anne Murray / Christine Polk7-5, 6-4
2024-08-01vs G6 ACAC Stallard - GiancasproWon 20
W#1 DoublesTeresa Whitworth / Laura West Hatcher vs Judiann Drash / Alcira Varela de Guzman6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLeemore Burke / Melissa Mauck vs Kathie Naylor / Robin Petrine7-5, 6-4
2024-07-25vs E3 MTC 8.0 DowningWon 20
W#1 DoublesTeresa Whitworth / Laura West Hatcher vs Maureen McGrath / Cindy Eramian6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMelissa Mauck / Nancy Young vs Janice McGarity / Gale Tune6-4, 6-4
2024-07-11vs A1 Hermitage-WalshWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeemore Burke / Margaret Corwin vs Catherine Fallin / Sherri Phillips6-2, 6-2
2024-06-27vs C4 Belmont - ColginLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeemore Burke / Melissa Mauck vs Victoria Bradt / Silvia Sykes5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2024-06-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesKatherine Hill / Melissa Mauck vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Weeknight Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Nancy Young
published
Teresa Whitworth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Katherine Hill
published
3.60
Leemore Burke
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.59
Mary Bartzen
published
3.41
Laura West Hatcher
published
3.36
Melissa Mauck
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Hilary Long
published
Margaret Corwin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Mauck + Leemore Burke3350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Young
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Teresa Whitworth
26W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Katherine Hill
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Leemore Burke
54W–66L career · 4 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
Mary Bartzen
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.59
Laura West Hatcher
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
Melissa Mauck
68W–75L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
Hilary Long
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Margaret Corwin
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.