Teams

OK/Lane/55&over 8.0M

2022 OKCAdult 55 & Over League · 8.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-15vs CantrellWon 20
W#1 DoublesLane Wheeler / Kent Coleman vs Alexander Mdzinarishvili / Mark Shuck6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTom Small / Ken Burkhart vs Will Allen / Matthew Wheatley6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-01vs CantrellWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Peters / Terry Stokes vs Stephen Henry / Mark Shuck6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLee Maytubby / Ben Mccarley vs Fred Lueck / Will Allen5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMark Hoesel / RICHARD DAVIS vs Leroy Cantrell / Michael Wiens6-0, 6-0
2022-04-24vs CantrellLost 03
L#1 DoublesLee Maytubby / Ken Burkhart vs Will Allen / Barney Moon6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGreg Lane / Ben Mccarley vs Michael Wiens / Roger Dabney2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMark Hoesel / Tony Pound vs Stephen Henry / Mark Shuck4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-04-10vs CantrellWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Hoesel / Greg Morrison vs Craig Milkowski / Roger Dabney6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTom Small / Greg Lane vs Stephen Henry / Michael Wiens4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMatthew Kutch / RICHARD DAVIS vs Fred Lueck / Leroy Cantrell6-3, 6-3
2022-04-03vs CantrellWon 21
W#1 DoublesLane Wheeler / Ben Mccarley vs Barney Moon / Will Allen6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Peters / Kent Coleman vs Alexander Mdzinarishvili / Roger Dabney6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTerry Stokes / Greg Lane vs Stephen Henry / Mark Shuck6-7, 3-6
2022-03-27vs CantrellWon 21
L#1 DoublesLane Wheeler / Ken Burkhart vs Stephen Henry / Mark Shuck6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMark Hoesel / Greg Morrison vs James Billingsley / Michael Wiens6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichael Peters / Greg Lane vs Matthew Wheatley / Frank Barry5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-03-20vs CantrellWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Peters / Ben Mccarley vs Craig Milkowski / Ken Coffey6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKent Coleman / Lee Maytubby vs Matthew Wheatley / Fred Lueck4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKen Burkhart / Terry Stokes vs Barney Moon / Will Allen6-3, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Matthew Kutch
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.92
Mark Hoesel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.83
Kent Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.75
Lane Wheeler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Ben Mccarley
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.72
Greg Lane
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Terry Stokes
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.52
Lee Maytubby
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Greg Morrison
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Tom Small
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Ken Burkhart
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Michael Peters
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
RICHARD DAVIS
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tony Pound
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ben Mccarley + Lane Wheeler8553% games+14.1% vs expected
Kent Coleman + Lane Wheeler12755% games+3.7% vs expected
Terry Stokes + Lane Wheeler5452% games+1.9% vs expected
Ben Mccarley + Tom Small2446% games−0.7% vs expected
Greg Morrison + RICHARD DAVIS13260% games−1.0% vs expected
Michael Peters + Kent Coleman5253% games−1.6% vs expected
Ben Mccarley + Terry Stokes81346% games−3.2% vs expected
Greg Lane + Terry Stokes4650% games−4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Kutch
76W–25L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.16
Mark Hoesel
42W–70L career · 10 lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
3.92
Kent Coleman
78W–57L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
Lane Wheeler
94W–73L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Ben Mccarley
47W–65L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Greg Lane
81W–68L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
Terry Stokes
67W–89L career · 6 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.66
Lee Maytubby
30W–58L career · 3 lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Greg Morrison
85W–32L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
Tom Small
24W–56L career · 5 lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
3.28
Ken Burkhart
28W–48L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Peters
31W–30L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
RICHARD DAVIS
106W–88L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tony Pound
45W–60L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.