Teams

MVH Haskill SSL A18-4.5WW

2025 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 18&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI SSL A18&O 4.5 WW (5 player)

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-17vs MVC Hendricks SSL A18-4.5WWSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJill Braendle / Gabrielle Giertz vs Natalie Pickup / Heidi Hendricks5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesErin Nieves / Sophia Gossett vs Teresa Nelson / Kristen Snyder4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-04-05vs MVC Hendricks SSL A18-4.5WWWon 30
W#1 DoublesJill Braendle / Linda Schnobel vs Natalie Pickup / Kristen Snyder6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAbigail Schrotenboer vs Taylor LaBarge6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Gerling / Marissa Neubert vs Michelle Krick / Olivia Wolfe6-1, 6-1
2025-02-22vs MVC Hendricks SSL A18-4.5WWWon 30
W#1 DoublesJill Braendle / Sophia Gossett vs Teresa Nelson / Taylor LaBarge6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAbigail Schrotenboer vs Olivia Wolfe6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLynn Bender / Yexin Li vs Michelle Krick / Danielle Juhle6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WMI SSL A18&O 4.5 WW (5 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Jill Braendle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.24
Abigail Schrotenboer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Kelly Haskill
published
4.11
Erin Nieves
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Yexin Li
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.85
Lynn Bender
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Gabrielle Giertz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Sophia Gossett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.68
Linda Schnobel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Gerling
published
Marissa Neubert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Nieves + Lynn Bender2352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Braendle
73W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
4.36
4.5
Abigail Schrotenboer
15W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
Kelly Haskill
41W–14L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19
Erin Nieves
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.11
Yexin Li
29W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
Lynn Bender
49W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.85
Gabrielle Giertz
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.73
Sophia Gossett
16W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.72
Linda Schnobel
80W–75L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Jennifer Gerling
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marissa Neubert
17W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.