Teams

Ja.Mellott18T

2023 Cap Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5-4.0-4.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-12vs St.Wingo18TLost 02
L#2 DoublesCorey Cooper / Joshua Ganeles vs Neil Hauge / John Wagner7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLouis Crow / Baaqir Yusuf vs Andrew Austin / Andrew Pham4-6, 2-6
2023-07-11vs Ti.Koves18TLost 02
L#2 DoublesJoshua Ganeles / Edwal Stone vs Jeffrey Brooks / Kevin Abourisk4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesZachary Hopp / Louis Crow vs Timothy Koves / Philip Robertson2-6, 6-7
2023-06-27vs Ca.Rutledge18TWon 10
W#3 DoublesZachary Hopp / James Mellott vs Paul Brinckerhoff / Lance Williams6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-06-13vs Co.Sutler18TSplit 11
W#2 DoublesNicholas Lau / Joshua Ganeles vs Frank Allison / Joe Goatcher6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesZachary Hopp / Louis Crow vs Cody Sutler / William Dunn4-6, 3-6
2023-06-06vs Be.Koren18T3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLouis Crow / Brady Sowers vs Max Stevenson / Joe Neylan2-6, 2-6
2023-05-30vs Co.Vinson18TSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJoshua Ganeles / Edwal Stone vs Robert Whitehurst / Kevin Wolborsky3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBaaqir Yusuf / Brady Sowers vs Hank McCullough / James McCown6-4, 7-6
2023-05-23vs Ma.Gregson18T3.5Split 11
W#2 DoublesCorey Cooper / Joshua Ganeles vs Ty Giggey / Cade Petty6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBrady Sowers / Baaqir Yusuf vs Maxwell Gregson / Reece Desonglo3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5-4.0-4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Alex Renfrow
published 4.5
4.00
Eric Hilpert
published
3.83
Joshua Ganeles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Edwal Stone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Brady Sowers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Zachary Hopp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Byron Byars
published 4
3.33
Louis Crow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
James Mellott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Louis Crow + Zachary Hopp2643% games−4.0% vs expected
Edwal Stone + Louis Crow224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alex Renfrow
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
4.35
Eric Hilpert
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
4.00
4
Joshua Ganeles
65W–123L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Edwal Stone
51W–73L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Brady Sowers
67W–71L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
3.5
Zachary Hopp
56W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.48
4
Byron Byars
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Louis Crow
49W–52L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%88%12%
3.33
James Mellott
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.