Teams

A18 2.5W LT3 Mason

2026 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over Summer · NEOTA A18&O 2.5 Women Summer

3 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-07vs A18 2.5W TP1 DerrigLost 02
L#1 DoublesCari Orris / Kathy Arther vs Chelsea Derrig / Angie Klisan2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Bragiel / Melissa Cort vs Rebecca Vogt / Jenny Magistrelli4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-06-30vs A18 2.5W MV2 TomalloLost 02
L#1 DoublesBarbara Bragiel / Georgia Coda vs Kathleen Sekella / Karen Conkey2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesKathy Arther vs Xia Wu1-6, 1-6
2026-06-16vs A18 2.5W CV1 NickelLost 01
L#2 DoublesCari Orris / Georgia Coda vs Jill Fanos / Marcia Steele6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-06-09vs A18 2.5W MV3 VentreSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMelissa Cort / Barbara Bragiel vs Giovanna Ventre / Susan Richlak7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJessy Hendrickx / Kathy Arther vs Barb Schoen / Eva Schoen1-6, 2-6
2026-06-02vs A18 2.5W TP1 DerrigSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBarbara Bragiel / Kathy Arther vs Chelsea Derrig / Kelsey Potere1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJessy Hendrickx / Cari Orris vs Jenny Magistrelli / Grace Cea6-4, 6-4
2026-05-19vs A18 2.5W CC LammersLost 01
L#1 DoublesBarbara Bragiel / Cari Orris vs Leah Cordy / Anita Lammers7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2026-05-12vs A18 2.5W CV1 NickelLost 01
L#1 DoublesGeorgia Coda / Cari Orris vs Milly Catalano / Robin Kleinman4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings22 teams · NEOTA A18&O 2.5 Women Summer
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A18 2.5W MV3 Ventre10024618202
2A18 2.5W GR1 Fletcher8221919201
3A18 2.5W BR Fulmer8222822199
4A18 2.5W LT2 Mitchell82191125228
5A18 2.5W LT1 McCauley73201025208
6A18 2.5W MV2 Tomallo73191125204
7A18 2.5W PCC Innes64181229252
8A18 2.5W SP Casellas64161430248
9A18 2.5W MV1 Greenhalgh-Stanley64161431254
10A18 2.5W CC Lammers55171328231
11A18 2.5W CV2 Parker46171331266
12A18 2.5W CV1 Nickel46141635259
13A18 2.5W FA Morse46131736280
14A18 2.5W WR Cannata37121837282
15A18 2.5W SH Widders37111939284
16A18 2.5W CL Gobrogge37121840274
17A18 2.5W PM Davis3792144290
18A18 2.5W BA Johnson3792145298
19A18 2.5W LCC Brady2681635257
20A18 2.5W AO Aguilera1751938261
21A18 2.5W LT3 Mason01052550339
22A18 2.5W GR2 Kestner01022857361

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.05 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.27
Barbara Bragiel
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.10
Cari Orris
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
1.78
Kathy Arther
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Barbara Bragiel
8W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Cari Orris
5W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Kathy Arther
0W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.