Teams

BC-MCC/JanetWisialowski

2021 Adult 18 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Men - 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-29vs BC-MiraCosta/MarkWarshawLost 01
L#2 DoublesBradley Buchanan / John Acker vs Manav Gupta / SAL DEGUZMAN4-6, 5-7
2021-05-22vs BC-PVTC/TomWheelerWon 10
W#2 SinglesBradley Buchanan vs Chris Berkin4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-05-08vs BC-AltaVista/BenNguyenWon 10
W#3 DoublesBradley Buchanan / Michael Stillman vs Jesse Wu / HPC Povishyu4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-01Split 11
W#1 DoublesCraig Benner / David Davis vs Darren Church / Edson Park6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesBradley Buchanan vs Brian Hall2-6, 2-6
2021-04-24vs BC-MiraCosta/MarkWarshawWon 10
W#1 DoublesSteve Shepley / Craig Benner vs Rajkumar Govindaraj / Ramakant Shenoy6-1, 6-2
2021-04-17vs BC-PVTC/TomWheelerWon 10
W#1 DoublesCraig Benner / Christopher Grey vs Tom Wheeler / Nitin Bhatia6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Craig Benner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
William Reiter
published
3.62
Steve Shepley
published
3.55
Jesse Givich
published
3.44
Michael Stillman
published
3.35
KEVIN QUIGLEY
published
3.31
Stephen McGee
published
Gerald Torres
published 3.5
3.22
Bradley Buchanan
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Patrick Ready
published
Janet Wisialowski
published
Stephen Testa
published
Tim Bixler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Benner + Steve Shepley1444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Craig Benner
37W–10L career · 3 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.68
William Reiter
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.63
Steve Shepley
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
Jesse Givich
22W–16L career · no lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.55
Michael Stillman
16W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
3.44
KEVIN QUIGLEY
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.35
Stephen McGee
8W–1L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Gerald Torres
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Bradley Buchanan
40W–50L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
Patrick Ready
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
Janet Wisialowski
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Stephen Testa
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tim Bixler
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.