Teams

Smith, John

2025 Adult 55 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 8.0 Combo - Men - 55

15 players · average NTRP 3.88 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-15vs HOAWC/Strader/55&over8.0MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrad Hagen / Stephen Lunsford vs Brian Burton / Lanny Wake6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSteve Boos / Jeff Thimgan vs Mark Evenson / Steve Fabrizius6-4, 6-2
2025-05-04vs HOAWC/Strader/55&over8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesTerry Jackson / Steven Osborne vs Robert Buckner / Duane Strader4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDavid May / Pete Jackson vs Gonzalo Francisco Rodriguez / Timothy Doherty2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeff Thimgan / John Smith vs Jerry Vanderpool / Mark Evenson3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Combo - Men - 55 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Jeff Thimgan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Chris Cox
published 4
3.63
Thomas Geiger
published
3.63
David May
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Pete Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Patrick Klein
published
3.46
Brad Hagen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
DAVID ROBASKA
published 3.5
3.09
Steve Boos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Gregory Russell
published
John Smith
published
Stephen Lunsford
published
Steve Baker
published
Steven Osborne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Terry Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Smith + Steve Baker0633% games−11.0% vs expected
David May + Gregory Russell7455% gamesnot enough data
Steven Osborne + Chris Cox314 matchesnot enough data
David May + Terry Jackson314 matchesnot enough data
Brad Hagen + Thomas Geiger123 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Thimgan + Steve Boos213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Thimgan
49W–64L career · 2 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.82
4
Chris Cox
27W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Geiger
24W–43L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
David May
32W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.63
Pete Jackson
27W–59L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.56
Patrick Klein
56W–30L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Brad Hagen
7W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
DAVID ROBASKA
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Boos
21W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.09
Gregory Russell
26W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Smith
4W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephen Lunsford
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Baker
21W–21L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven Osborne
26W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Terry Jackson
25W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.