Teams

Start with Love

2022 Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Fall · Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Fall 4.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.73 / MARYLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Fall 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
Emma Shine
published 4.5
3.71
Gina Ryan
published 4
3.67
Jenelle Langen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.58
Teri Fahlgren
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Beth Kiesner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.48
Jolyn Green
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Paige Bartlett
published
3.17
Mairin Kuligowski
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Boni Vinter
published 3.5
3.11
Mary Aaron
published
3.11
Audrey Zeidan
published 3.5
3.07
Margaret Brown
published
2.95
Diana Shevlin
published 3.5
2.94
Lisa Means
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Kate Wesley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jolyn Green + Beth Kiesner20960% games+0.2% vs expected
Jenelle Langen + Teri Fahlgren131052% games−1.1% vs expected
Audrey Zeidan + Diana Shevlin1534% games−6.3% vs expected
Mairin Kuligowski + Beth Kiesner213 matchesnot enough data
Beth Kiesner + Mary Aaron303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Emma Shine
13W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
4.52
4
Gina Ryan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Jenelle Langen
243W–115L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Teri Fahlgren
114W–115L career · 3 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
3.5
Beth Kiesner
96W–50L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Jolyn Green
78W–44L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.48
Paige Bartlett
21W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Mairin Kuligowski
53W–77L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Boni Vinter
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
Mary Aaron
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Audrey Zeidan
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
Margaret Brown
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Diana Shevlin
23W–16L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.95
3.5
Lisa Means
46W–131L career · 3 lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
2.94
Kate Wesley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.