Teams

Robichek

2024 55&Over Mixed · 8.0 Mixed

18 players · average NTRP 3.89 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-06vs HirshLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Steadly / Suzanne Lengyel vs Daniel Plotnick / Cheryl-Anne Bliss3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarc Cohen / Laurie Elvove vs Daniel Zimmon / Heide Marie Bliss5-7, 4-6
2024-05-29vs Metro: BlueWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Steadly / Suzanne Lengyel vs Jonathan Klee / Gigi Banks7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-05-05vs Metro: BlueLost 03
L#1 DoublesRudolf van Mol / Elizabeth Gormley vs Aliza Bitton / James Helburn1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Frantz / Bobby Choe vs Sondra Glueck / Carlos Rios4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTony Ferrante / Suzanne Favia vs Jonathan Klee / Gigi Banks1-6, 1-6
2024-04-21vs HirshWon 20
W#2 DoublesLisa Frantz / Marc Cohen vs Linda Eichenbaum / Daniel Zimmon6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKathie McDermott-Greene / Bobby Choe vs Heide Marie Bliss / Daniel Plotnick6-0, 6-4
2024-04-13vs Metro: BlueLost 12
L#1 DoublesDaniel Katz / Laurie Elvove vs Shanon Blue / Isagani Soriano Aves1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Todrin / Kathy Rey vs Marc Werner / Ronni Armstrong6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesThomas Sheridan / Hildi Todrin vs Aliza Bitton / Andy Funk6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Robichek056919130
2Hirsh0551021151
3Metro: Blue0613515138

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Suzanne Favia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.91
Rudolf van Mol
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.86
Allison Liss
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.83
Marc Cohen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Lisa Frantz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Kathy Rey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Thomas Sheridan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
David Todrin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Daniel Katz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Bobby Choe
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Laurie Elvove
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
David Steadly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.41
Tony Ferrante
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Kathie McDermott-Greene
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Elizabeth Gormley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Hildi Todrin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Susan Robichek
published
Suzanne Lengyel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rudolf van Mol + Allison Liss11362% games+12.3% vs expected
David Todrin + Hildi Todrin2740% games+2.6% vs expected
David Steadly + Suzanne Lengyel9161% games+2.6% vs expected
Bobby Choe + Allison Liss3252% games+0.7% vs expected
Kathy Rey + Thomas Sheridan4255% games−3.8% vs expected
Marc Cohen + Laurie Elvove7649% games−6.4% vs expected
David Todrin + Laurie Elvove134 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Rey + Marc Cohen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Suzanne Favia
198W–131L career · 1 line in 2024
23%77%<1%
4.10
Rudolf van Mol
327W–239L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Allison Liss
67W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Marc Cohen
103W–74L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Lisa Frantz
210W–119L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Kathy Rey
269W–197L career · 1 line in 2024
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Thomas Sheridan
52W–66L career · 1 line in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
David Todrin
63W–70L career · 1 line in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Daniel Katz
27W–22L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4
Bobby Choe
279W–210L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
Laurie Elvove
29W–40L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
David Steadly
40W–65L career · 2 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Tony Ferrante
193W–138L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Kathie McDermott-Greene
168W–103L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Elizabeth Gormley
89W–44L career · 1 line in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Hildi Todrin
104W–133L career · 1 line in 2024
78%22%<1%
2.90
Susan Robichek
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Suzanne Lengyel
18W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.