Teams

WACTown Girls

2025 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 2.93 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-12-14vs V- LLW Malibu Mavericks-RobinsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesBeth Esters / Mary Crossley vs Denise Shaw / Bethany Mayer2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-12-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Crossley / Kelsey Davis vs Jennifer Bishop / Sally Miller0-6, 1-6
2025-11-23vs Valle Lindo VolleygirlsWon 10
W#2 DoublesGina Vladimirov / Mary Crossley vs Claudia Nevarez Lenehan / Roxane Beigel-coryell6-1, 6-1
2025-10-05vs Pierpont RacquettesWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Crossley / Lisa Weiss vs Kelley Knowlton / Saudamini Sindhar7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Siena Heintz
published
2.91
Lisa Weiss
published
2.88
Lisa Keatts
published
2.85
Gina Vladimirov
published 3
2.80
Ellen Swagerty
published 3
2.77
Mariah Tackett
published
2.77
Shirley Gordon
published
2.75
Mary Crossley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Kelsey Davis
published
2.65
HEather Hirschi
published 3
2.64
Robbie Knauer
published
2.63
Beth Esters
published 3
2.60
Cynthia Gorlitz
published 2.5
2.56
Marty Fraser
published
2.50
Brenda Kyser
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Weiss + Gina Vladimirov6460% games+12.4% vs expected
Mary Crossley + Lisa Weiss2942% games−2.0% vs expected
Mary Crossley + Lisa Keatts224 matchesnot enough data
Robbie Knauer + Marty Fraser134 matchesnot enough data
Ellen Swagerty + Cynthia Gorlitz123 matchesnot enough data
HEather Hirschi + Cynthia Gorlitz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Siena Heintz
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
Lisa Weiss
22W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
Lisa Keatts
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Gina Vladimirov
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Ellen Swagerty
14W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Mariah Tackett
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Shirley Gordon
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Mary Crossley
50W–53L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Kelsey Davis
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
HEather Hirschi
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
2.65
Robbie Knauer
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
2.64
3
Beth Esters
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
2.63
2.5
Cynthia Gorlitz
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%21%79%
2.60
Marty Fraser
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.56
3
Brenda Kyser
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.