Teams

ZGilbert (Jeff Adams)

2024 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Wed PM

10 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-01vs WLewis (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCarl Jacobs / Charles Bridgen vs Tiger Zhang / Brandon Lucio2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMax Glassner / Zak Gilbert vs Will Lewis III / Jeff Winterich3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-04-24vs KFox (Blakeney)Split 11
L#1 DoublesCharles Bridgen / Carl Jacobs vs David Tyson / Peter Hollis0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesZak Gilbert / Kevin Reinhard vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-17vs HPence (PLCC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesZak Gilbert / Jonathan Diaz vs Sam Basden / Keith Hargis6-0, 6-1
2024-04-10vs JDichak (WSRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesCarl Jacobs / Robert Marlowe vs DJ Kulkarni / Joseph Dichak7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-03vs ABackus (Southampton)Won 10
W#2 DoublesZak Gilbert / Max Glassner vs Don Miller / Ronnie Melker5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-03-20Won 20
W#1 DoublesCarl Jacobs / Charles Bridgen vs Jack Horton / Andrew Dsouza6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesZak Gilbert / Mac Schweppe vs Taylor Brown / Patrick McKinney6-2, 6-3
2024-03-13vs KFox (Blakeney)Lost 12
W#2 DoublesMac Schweppe / Carl Jacobs vs Rodney Myers / Ganesh Pallem6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesOrnob Roy vs Nitin Sharma2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesZak Gilbert / Kevin Reinhard vs Kevin Fox / Nitesh Upadhyay3-6, 2-6
2024-03-12vs WLewis (Queens)Split 11
W#1 DoublesSean OLeary / Carl Jacobs vs Will Lewis III / Gregory Vlahos7-5, 6-0
L#3 DoublesZak Gilbert / Andrew DeLemos vs Paul DeConinck / Vik Kakkar2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Carl Jacobs
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Timothy Whelan
published
3.23
Charles Bridgen
published 3.5
3.22
Hani Mahgoub
published 3
3.20
Ornob Roy
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Robert Marlowe
published
3.10
Andrew DeLemos
published 3.5
3.09
Jonathan Diaz
published
2.92
Zak Gilbert
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Sean OLeary
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Diaz + Andrew DeLemos123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carl Jacobs
73W–37L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.54
Timothy Whelan
22W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Charles Bridgen
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Hani Mahgoub
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.22
3.5
Ornob Roy
35W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Robert Marlowe
25W–44L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Andrew DeLemos
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Jonathan Diaz
5W–20L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Zak Gilbert
45W–29L career · 7 lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
2.92
Sean OLeary
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.