Teams

APacheco (BCC)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-05-06vs MEccleston/KSimmons (Col Beatty)Won 20
W#1 DoublesJanuary Crimin / Kathleen Dorff vs Lizette Conover / Jennifer McCoy6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Scholz / Amy Marsh vs Tracey Loughlin-Young / Kristy Simmons6-2, 6-2
2022-04-29vs LDumler/Tedrick (Charlotte Swim)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesIrene Rapaglia / Nancy Scholz vs Laura Williams / Ivy Tedrick1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKim Merritt / January Crimin vs Ann Meadows / Ali Hoce2-6, 1-6
2022-04-22vs TOrmand/DVanHoy (Raintree)Won 20
W#1 DoublesApril Pacheco / Irene Rapaglia vs Dawn VanHoy / Katie Sarjeant6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNancy Scholz / Dori Cazorla vs Christine Demille / Kristen Eshleman6-1, 6-4
2022-04-15vs CHighfield (Firethorne)Won 30
W#1 DoublesApril Pacheco / Kelley Schoeneck vs Christina Highfield / Anne Paramore6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDori Cazorla / Susan Blackman vs Vera James / Patty Swan6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesIrene Rapaglia / Kristen Venetis vs Meghan Rawlings / Johanne Bulger6-2, 6-3
2022-04-08vs LAndersen (Chestnut/Shannamara)Won 31
L#1 DoublesKathleen Stepp / January Crimin vs Julie Smallwood / Stephanie Gossert3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKelley Schoeneck vs Lori Andersen6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Scholz / Christina Pardi vs Mary McGarvey / Carolyn Henderson6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTerri Kletch vs Christine Zetts6-3, 6-0
2022-04-01vs EPease/MJones (Piper Glen)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesIrene Rapaglia / Kim Merritt vs Emily Pease / Tiffany Kopittke3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKelley Schoeneck / January Crimin vs Misty Jones / Jennifer Gibson7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesApril Pacheco / Nancy Scholz vs Erin Clapham / Ashley Olsen2-6, 4-6
2022-03-25vs CMcWilliams/Wainscott (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJanuary Crimin / Christina Pardi vs Deborah Toomey / Ruth di Stefano3-6, 1-6
2022-03-11vs AGreer (Weddington)Split 11
W#2 DoublesTerri Kletch / January Crimin vs Helen Carnes / Heidi Barney3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNancy Scholz vs Brandi Hoover0-6, 1-6
2022-03-04vs KNeigoot (Myers Park)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesApril Pacheco / Irene Rapaglia vs Sara Willis / Margie Lynch6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Scholz / Christina Pardi vs Tamara Robb / Christie Farley0-6, 4-6
2022-02-25vs JWaleski (OPRC)Won 21
L#1 DoublesJanuary Crimin / Irene Rapaglia vs Erin Lentz / Keiran Llaneza6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTerri Kletch vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKathleen Stepp / Nancy Scholz vs Jamie Dorsey / Staci Mills2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-02-18vs SAdditon/VPomfrey (Rolling Hills)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Dorff / Kelley Schoeneck vs Karen Harrell / Sandi Lovell6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Kelley Schoeneck
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Irene Rapaglia
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.37
Kathleen Stepp
published
3.31
Christina Pardi
published 3.5
3.22
Terri Kletch
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
January Crimin
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.04
Amy Marsh
published 3
3.03
Dori Cazorla
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Susan Blackman
published
2.68
Nancy Scholz
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Singles 13% · published 3
April Pacheco
published
Kathleen Dorff
published
Kim Merritt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dori Cazorla + Kathleen Stepp4353% games+4.9% vs expected
Dori Cazorla + January Crimin141449% games−3.0% vs expected
January Crimin + Kathleen Stepp3840% games−4.1% vs expected
Dori Cazorla + Terri Kletch4251% gamesnot enough data
Dori Cazorla + Nancy Scholz224 matchesnot enough data
January Crimin + Terri Kletch224 matchesnot enough data
January Crimin + Irene Rapaglia224 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Stepp + Irene Rapaglia314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kelley Schoeneck
37W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Irene Rapaglia
104W–66L career · 6 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Kathleen Stepp
25W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Christina Pardi
38W–46L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Terri Kletch
60W–31L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
January Crimin
81W–81L career · 7 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3
Amy Marsh
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.04
3.5
Dori Cazorla
79W–92L career · 2 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
Susan Blackman
8W–15L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Nancy Scholz
20W–28L career · 8 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
April Pacheco
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen Dorff
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kim Merritt
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.