Teams

Smashers Combo

2023 Montgomery Combo Winter · Montgomery Combo 8.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-04-02vs Bashi BazooksLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristopher Andall / Bradley Jacques vs Brian Bichy / Garrett Kessler7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2023-03-28vs IvanLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristopher Andall / Bradley Jacques vs Greg Merril / Igor Chechik3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-03-15vs IvanWon 10
W#1 DoublesGregory Fox / Bradley Jacques vs Liviu Carare / Ricardo Green6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-09vs Bashi BazooksLost 01
L#1 DoublesJustin Cady / Bradley Jacques vs Brent Kendall / Sinan Kalayoglu2-6, 1-6
2023-02-18vs Bashi BazooksLost 01
L#1 DoublesJuan Jose Tijero / Bill Gehrke vs J Nathan / Barry Weiner2-6, 1-6
2023-02-13vs IvanWon 10
W#2 DoublesSandeep Krishnan / Ryan Rohn vs Greg Merril / Steven Dunne6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2023-02-04vs Bashi BazooksWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristopher Andall / Ryan Rohn vs Sinan Kalayoglu / Paul Brennan6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTim Huber / Bradley Jacques vs Brian Bichy / Zaf Basha7-5, 7-5
2023-01-19vs IvanLost 01
L#1 DoublesGregory Fox / Bradley Jacques vs Larry Johnson / Artur Kalil3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christopher Andall
published 4.5
4.10
Kieran Coscia
published
4.05
Gregory Fox
published 4.5
3.75
Justin Cady
published
3.72
Juan Jose Tijero
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Henry Forster
published 4
3.68
Ryan Rohn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Trevor Lessard
published
3.59
Bradley Jacques
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
Christopher Bragale
published 3.5
3.01
Alan Klein
published 3.5
Sandeep Krishnan
published
Tim Huber
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Henry Forster + Ryan Rohn213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christopher Andall
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kieran Coscia
12W–19L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Gregory Fox
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
4.05
Justin Cady
27W–19L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Juan Jose Tijero
606W–366L career · 5 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Henry Forster
15W–9L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Ryan Rohn
242W–218L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Trevor Lessard
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
Bradley Jacques
192W–208L career · 10 lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Christopher Bragale
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Alan Klein
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
Sandeep Krishnan
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tim Huber
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.