Teams

WI Adult 18&O 3.0W GML Lake Country WAC Paz

2026 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesMeg Roman / Michele Dearing vs Julie Molsky / Claire Woelfle6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesCaina Weiner vs Lindsay Harman2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMercedes Paz / Carrie Fleming vs Michelle Thren / Deborah Pape6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Linnemanstons vs Carissa Casey6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStephanie Hillmann / Maricela Feker vs Susan Schultz / Linda Balthazor6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesMercedes Paz / Caina Weiner vs Shelley Burns / Jennifer Williams6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Linnemanstons vs Suzanne Laurila6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMeg Roman / Carrie Fleming vs Stacy Blattner / Kate McKenzie6-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesKimberly Kurey vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAnna Huck / Stephanie Hillmann vs Karen Moran / Erin Dummert7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Linnemanstons / Meg Roman vs Chris DAmico / Tessa Papcke6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCaina Weiner vs Megan Paddock6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMercedes Paz / Anna Huck vs Melissa Hoeft / Leanne Roth3-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesKimberly Kurey vs Rebecca Greving5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesTara Fox / Carrie Fleming vs Julie Klein / Monica Lineberger6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMeg Roman / Elizabeth Linnemanstons vs Katie Goetter / Stacy Gass6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCaina Weiner vs Brenda Heinecke6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStephanie Hillmann / Kimberly Kurey vs Stephanie Jansen / Sheila Washburn6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMercedes Paz vs Mary Ellen Levra0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTara Fox / Michele Dearing vs Joyce Casey / Tiffany Zignego6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Linnemanstons / Meg Roman vs Tina Maloney / Amy Germershausen6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKimberly Kurey vs Gaelyn Gingery6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCaina Weiner / Anna Huck vs Kelly Rodenkirk / Katie Zanoni6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMercedes Paz vs Nisha Chandrasekharan3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTara Fox / Stephanie Hillmann vs Bernadette Trucco / Olga Kaslow6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Linnemanstons / Audra Tubin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesCaina Weiner vs Camilla Adelman1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMeg Roman / Stephanie Hillmann vs Jennifer Mcdonald / Kara McMahon6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMercedes Paz vs Melissa Bashaw6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMaricela Feker / Tara Fox vs Betsy Jost / Monica Carlin7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Caina Weiner
usually #1 Singles 54%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 3
2.92
Elizabeth Linnemanstons
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
2.90
Carrie Fleming
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Maricela Feker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Audra Tubin
published 3
2.77
Stephanie Hillmann
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.77
Meg Roman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Tara Fox
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Kimberly Kurey
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.70
Anna Huck
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Mercedes Paz
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maricela Feker + Carrie Fleming4164% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Kurey + Meg Roman224 matchesnot enough data
Anna Huck + Mercedes Paz134 matchesnot enough data
Meg Roman + Elizabeth Linnemanstons213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Caina Weiner
44W–21L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Elizabeth Linnemanstons
13W–2L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Carrie Fleming
46W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Maricela Feker
19W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Audra Tubin
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.79
Stephanie Hillmann
10W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Meg Roman
13W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Tara Fox
6W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Kimberly Kurey
21W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Anna Huck
4W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Mercedes Paz
6W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.