Teams

TOC.Hollett

2026 CTRL Adult 55 & Over · Adult 55 & Over 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.19 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-16vs TOC.RessLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoanie Arteta / Shelly Jude vs Barbara Reichelt / Mary Parker2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRegina Davis / Ruth Dobson-Torres vs Barbara Gillespie / Virginia Brezac2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKati Ray / Lydia Pasteris vs Valerie Dorrier / Anne-Marie Conklin1-6, 2-6
2026-04-09vs TOC.ButlerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRegina Davis / Laura Caldwell vs Joey Gibson / Stacie Fernstrum6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesShelly Jude / Sharon Fadelici vs Debbie Zaccardelli / Nicole Crain6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-02vs PW.FrancisLost 02
L#1 DoublesAraya Coffey / Audrey Hollett vs Carolyn Hidalgo / Margo Stutesman4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesShelly Jude / Kari Moncrief vs Rebecca Jacobsen / Jennifer Hensley5-7, 0-6
2026-03-26vs LOCH.HoylesWon 21
W#1 DoublesLydia Pasteris / Kati Ray vs Ana Maria Fernandez Serrat / Rosanne Facktor7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKari Moncrief / Shelly Jude vs Michelle Hoyles / Kristine Pelt2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAraya Coffey / Audrey Hollett vs Michele Mulcahy / Monica Palmer3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-03-13vs PW.FrancisSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRegina Davis / Laura Caldwell vs Kellie Francis / Elaine Auslander1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJoanie Arteta / Shelly Jude vs Molly Grundner / Rebecca Jacobsen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-03-12vs TOC.RessLost 12
L#1 DoublesRegina Davis / Laura Caldwell vs Maya Ress / Elizabeth Flynt3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAraya Coffey / Shelly Jude vs Valerie Dorrier / Chrissy Morgan6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAudrey Hollett / Sharon Fadelici vs Patricia Twomey / Barbara Gillespie7-5, 7-5
2026-03-05vs TOC.ButlerWon 21
L#1 DoublesRegina Davis / Ruth Dobson-Torres vs Joey Gibson / Stacie Fernstrum4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Caldwell / Shelly Jude vs Lannie Hoffman / Debbie Zaccardelli6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJoanie Arteta / Kati Ray vs Lauren Burns / Kendra McCormick6-1, 6-3
2026-02-19vs LOCH.HoylesLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura Caldwell / Shelly Jude vs Michelle Hoyles / Laura Stein6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKati Ray / Ruth Dobson-Torres vs Rosanne Facktor / Ana Maria Fernandez Serrat3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAraya Coffey / Sharon Fadelici vs Michele Mulcahy / DeLana Anderson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Lydia Pasteris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Shelly Jude
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Regina Davis
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.15
Laura Caldwell
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
3.10
Ruth Dobson-Torres
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Joanie Arteta
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Araya Coffey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.93
Sharon Fadelici
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Kati Ray
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Audrey Hollett
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.63
Kari Moncrief
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Audrey Hollett + Sharon Fadelici8650% games−1.1% vs expected
Shelly Jude + Regina Davis1440% gamesnot enough data
Kari Moncrief + Shelly Jude044 matchesnot enough data
Laura Caldwell + Regina Davis033 matchesnot enough data
Audrey Hollett + Araya Coffey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lydia Pasteris
118W–96L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Shelly Jude
135W–160L career · 8 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Regina Davis
27W–45L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Laura Caldwell
37W–20L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.15
3.5
Ruth Dobson-Torres
27W–40L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
Joanie Arteta
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Araya Coffey
84W–80L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Sharon Fadelici
183W–140L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Kati Ray
76W–81L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Audrey Hollett
33W–21L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Kari Moncrief
94W–150L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.