Teams

MILL VALLEY 40AW3.5A-DT

2023 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5 Daytime

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Tina Jennings
published
3.38
Lisa Kift
published
3.31
Kirsten Edwards
published
3.30
Aimee McCarthy
published 3.5
3.25
Mary McLain
published
3.15
Mallary Walker
published
3.08
Hilary Lipner
published
3.06
Wendy Nichols
published
2.98
Toni Brayer
published
2.88
Tuyen Bonneau
published
2.87
Donna Rogers
published
2.62
Anna Hindley
published 3
2.60
Ingrid Tolson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Hindley + Tuyen Bonneau123 matchesnot enough data
Mallary Walker + Kirsten Edwards213 matchesnot enough data
Mallary Walker + Aimee McCarthy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tina Jennings
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.51
Lisa Kift
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.38
Kirsten Edwards
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Aimee McCarthy
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Mary McLain
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.25
Mallary Walker
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
Hilary Lipner
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
Wendy Nichols
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
Toni Brayer
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.98
Tuyen Bonneau
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
2.88
Donna Rogers
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Anna Hindley
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.62
Ingrid Tolson
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.