Teams

MI-Rock Lobsters-Holland

2023 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0

23 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesKevin Peck / Naomi Knight vs Kim Li Eng / Eric Sieg3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMarian Sinkey / Mark Sinkey vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDean Wilson / Jeannie Pae vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-29vs BC-Camara/SunLost 12
L#1 DoublesTiffany Holland / Mark Sinkey vs Natalie Pryde / Mohammad Malakoutian3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNaomi Knight / Jim Holland vs Matthew Scher / Shawna Dash6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJessica Crump / Whit Crump vs Adam Corson / Beth Garr2-6, 3-6
2023-07-15vs EDG-Mavericks-GlinerLost 12
L#1 DoublesDenise Chen / Mien Chi Chen vs Nancy Chan / Jinhong No6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTiffany Holland / Jim Holland vs Seonyoon Ko / Song Ko6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEmer Hensey / Bernard Hensey vs Soojin To / Jason Cook2-6, 3-6
2023-07-08vs CP-Ace Breakers-ChinnWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeannie Pae / Dean Wilson vs Kamal Elkhadiri / Tina Chinn7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Carson / Russ Carson vs Glenn Chinn / Kelly Chiang6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRachel Bermudez / Kevin Peck vs Dana Laursen / ATUL ALATKAR0-6, 3-6
2023-07-01vs FC-PerreaultWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeannie Pae / Dean Wilson vs Jac Hand / Lisa Marquart4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDenise Chen / Mien Chi Chen vs Syam Pinnaka / Kathy Kenny6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNaomi Knight / Tawfik Gar-Aouy vs Patrick Moynihan / Christine Boyle6-7, 4-6
2023-06-25vs ETC-Rob's Boom Box-WyerWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristine Hanover / Mien Chi Chen vs Ginny Larsen / Mukund Soundararajan6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRachel Bermudez / Mark Sinkey vs Ursula Heenan / Humberto Hernandez4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBeth Flume / Bernard Hensey vs Akiko Leeman / David Halgren6-3, 6-2
2023-06-17vs PL-Dos Chamucos-EscalonaLost 12
W#1 DoublesTiffany Holland / Jim Holland vs Barrett Park / Marisa Preciado6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBernard Hensey / Emer Hensey vs Prasad Gopalkrishnan / Heather Liati2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesErika Brown / Gregory Brown vs Cheryl Wate / Srish Sawkar0-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings34 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWW-HBSQ-Furman7119518198
2PSC-Avengers-Kancherla7116819186
3FC-Good Gets-Mar6116513138
4NWW-CAC/SL-Fahey6116514147
5EDG-Mavericks-Gliner5215614161
6MI-Saelzer5213820178
7PL-Dos Chamucos-Escalona5213821187
8CAC/SL-Shoe Shine Lollipops-Xu5213821177
9BC-Camara/Sun5212923185
10CAC/SL-Split Step-Tracy5316820215
11MI-Rock Lobsters-Holland4312923189
12TCSP-Volleyamorous-Nguyen43111023182
13WSC-Azure-McAllen44141024189
14BC-Lee/Hancock44111327205
15TCSP-Au-Yeung44121229232
16ETC-Invisible T-Vu44101429239
17HBSQ-Court Jesters-Lane44131130243
18PL-Carter44111331238
19TCSP-Cornwall34111024191
20BELL-Mixed Up Hamsters-Harwood3491224184
21ETC-Rob's Boom Box-Wyer3481331220
22AYTC-It's Not Racquet Science-Chow3591532234
23TCSP-Crush-Wickham3591532232
24CP-Ace Breakers-Chinn25101124196
25AYTC-This is 40+ Love-Padilla2591226184
26AYTC-Zakahi2571428199
27FC-Perreault2581329212
28EDG-Double Edgers-Huang2571429195
29AYTC-Cortizone Weekend Warriors-Herrera2561532214
30WSC-Party at the Net-Krammer2551633213
31CP-Doubles Trouble-Han2561533215
32CP-TheAfterprty-Graves26101431233
33WSC-Ad-In-Adventures-Whitney1771736256
34RTC-Mixed Madness-Hansberry 40+0721938239

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Jeannie Pae
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Kristine Hanover
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Janelle Stewart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Whit Crump
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Rachel Bermudez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Denise Chen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.44
Elizabeth Carson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Tiffany Holland
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Emer Hensey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Naomi Knight
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Dean Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Jim Holland
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Mark Sinkey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Beth Flume
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Tawfik Gar-Aouy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Marian Sinkey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Bernard Hensey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Erika Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Mien Chi Chen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Kevin Peck
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
Russ Carson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jessica Crump
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Gregory Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jim Holland + Tiffany Holland5546% games+5.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Carson + Russ Carson6655% games−0.7% vs expected
Gregory Brown + Erika Brown2640% games−2.0% vs expected
Mien Chi Chen + Denise Chen3440% games−2.4% vs expected
Whit Crump + Jessica Crump6456% games−4.3% vs expected
Emer Hensey + Bernard Hensey2741% games−12.6% vs expected
Naomi Knight + Tawfik Gar-Aouy1438% gamesnot enough data
Dean Wilson + Jeannie Pae404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jeannie Pae
50W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Kristine Hanover
83W–14L career · 1 line in 2023
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Janelle Stewart
58W–28L career · 1 line in 2023
2%92%5%
3.77
4
Whit Crump
55W–25L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
4
Rachel Bermudez
70W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
3.5
Denise Chen
80W–30L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Elizabeth Carson
58W–43L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Tiffany Holland
61W–37L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Emer Hensey
57W–43L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Naomi Knight
15W–13L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Dean Wilson
57W–57L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Jim Holland
42W–27L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Mark Sinkey
29W–18L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Beth Flume
26W–20L career · 1 line in 2023
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Tawfik Gar-Aouy
27W–29L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Marian Sinkey
31W–42L career · 1 line in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Bernard Hensey
30W–42L career · 3 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Erika Brown
35W–39L career · 1 line in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
Mien Chi Chen
48W–40L career · 3 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Kevin Peck
32W–50L career · 2 lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Russ Carson
49W–29L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Jessica Crump
31W–41L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Gregory Brown
15W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.