Teams

GJTC JHANNAH

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - WS · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - WS

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-23vs GJTC JWENDTLost 01
L#1 SinglesRichard Plett vs Blake Bickham7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2023-05-19Won 20
W#2 SinglesKarsten Bump vs Ronald Engler6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDan Johnson / Richard Plett vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-16vs GJTC DFIFEWon 20
W#2 DoublesRichard Plett / Dan Johnson vs Stuart Hall / Trace Radler6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCraig Smith / Karsten Bump vs Rex Zerr / Benjamin Blair6-1, 6-4
2023-05-02vs GJTC JWENDTSplit 11
W#2 SinglesRichard Plett vs Blake Bickham6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKarsten Bump / Scott Powell vs Richard Ott / Keith Decker1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-04-30vs GJTC DFIFEWon 20
W#2 DoublesRichard Plett / Bradley Feldhaus vs Benjamin Blair / Stephen Kurtenbach6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCy Allen / Karsten Bump vs Rex Zerr / John Rhoads6-0, 6-1
2023-04-18vs GJTC KKILLIANWon 20
W#1 DoublesKarsten Bump / Mike Mahoney vs Matt Delao / Dan Terrell6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesRichard Plett vs Ronald Engler6-3, 7-5
2023-04-11vs GJTC JWENDTWon 10
W#2 DoublesRichard Plett / John Hanna vs Alan MacH / Keith Decker7-6, 6-4
2023-04-04vs GJTC DFIFESplit 11
L#1 DoublesRichard Plett / Christopher Cutsforth vs David Fife / Stuart Hall4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDan Johnson / Karsten Bump vs Ali Pirzadeh / John Rhoads6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Richard Plett
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.41
John Hanna
published
3.27
Karsten Bump
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.93
Scott Powell
published
Gary Kahn
published
Mike Mahoney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Hanna + Mike Mahoney123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Richard Plett
161W–68L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.48
John Hanna
37W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Karsten Bump
59W–23L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Christopher Cutsforth
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Powell
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
2.93
Gary Kahn
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mike Mahoney
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.