← Teams

CRRC-Mosbrucker

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Roxanna Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Nicola Ash
usually #3 Doubles 27%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3
Results7 ties
2022-03-27Won 1–0
W#1 SinglesNicola Ash vs Karen Lutz3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-03-06Won 2–0
W#1 SinglesNicola Ash vs Olga Senashova6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCheri Mosbrucker / Roxanna Johnson vs Jennie Burlingame / Heather Dale6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2022-02-27Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesCrystal Ounaphom / Roxanna Johnson vs Stephanie Pelton / Susan Brookfield6-2, 6-2
2022-02-13Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesMarina Strous / Roxanna Johnson vs Nancy Yen Shipley / Christin Harrington6-2, 6-0
2022-01-29Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesAmelia Hooker / Nicola Ash vs Harshi Waters / Sarah Fredericks1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCheri Mosbrucker / Roxanna Johnson vs Natalie Mesnier / Margo Yohner6-3, 6-2
2022-01-23Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesRoxanna Johnson / Marina Strous vs Christin Spagnoli / Kate Sullivan7-5, 6-0
2022-01-09Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesSharon Wise / Roxanna Johnson vs Xiaobo Dai / Laura Davies6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Roxanna Johnson
114W–65L career
0%98%2%
2.86
3
Nicola Ash
114W–136L career
1%99%0%
2.74

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.