Teams

Buckhorn Men's 3.0 - M. Steenland

2026 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesMaurice Steenland / Matthew Kovalick vs David Goodlow / Bonifacio Gutierrez4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesShawn Rasmussen / Joe Alvarez vs Michael Paolicelli / Carlos Rodriguez3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDon Valenti vs Manmad Sunkari6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJohn Maffei / Bill Almond vs Andrew Storer / DIL SUN5-7, 4-6
2025-11-01vs Tampa Palms - G. SturdevantWon 31
W#1 DoublesMatthew Kovalick / Daniel Espinoza vs Jim Hamidani / Diego Perez7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRyan Smith / Daniel Roller Nogueira vs Randall Smith / Zelko Kirincich3-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesDon Valenti vs Robert Philbin7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesShawn Rasmussen / Jordan Murray vs Les Lettiero / Mack Justin6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMatthew Kovalick / Rodrigo Vivi vs Bonifacio Gutierrez / Jeff Pebenito6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDaniel Roller Nogueira vs Michael McClain2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMaurice Steenland / Byron Beasley vs Yuechen Sun / Manmad Sunkari6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDaniel Espinoza vs Johnny Moreno4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJoe Alvarez / Jordan Murray vs Andrew Storer / DIL SUN6-7, 3-6
2025-10-11vs Tampa Palms - G. SturdevantWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatthew Kovalick / Daniel Espinoza vs Rene Vrolyk / Robert Philbin2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDon Valenti / Ryan Smith vs Steven Sutton / Jim Hamidani6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRodrigo Vivi / John Maffei vs Les Lettiero / Mack Justin1-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesDaniel Espinoza / Byron Beasley vs David Goodlow / Yuechen Sun0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDaniel Roller Nogueira vs Carlos Rodriguez6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesShawn Rasmussen / Ryan Smith vs Bonifacio Gutierrez / Girish Gopalakrishnan2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMaurice Steenland vs Johnny Moreno2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJoe Alvarez / Rodrigo Vivi vs Manmad Sunkari / Jeff Pebenito3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-20vs Tampa Palms - G. SturdevantLost 13
L#1 DoublesMaurice Steenland / Ryan Smith vs Mark Weissman / Diego Perez3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesByron Beasley vs Robert Philbin2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRodrigo Vivi / John Maffei vs Jim Hamidani / James Watling4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesShawn Rasmussen / Daniel Espinoza vs Zelko Kirincich / Mack Justin6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Matthew Kovalick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Daniel Espinoza
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.01
Maurice Steenland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.91
Shawn Rasmussen
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.82
Don Valenti
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Daniel Roller Nogueira
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Jordan Murray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Rodrigo Vivi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.65
Bill Almond
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
John Maffei
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.56
Joe Alvarez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.45
Byron Beasley
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Kovalick + Shawn Rasmussen6171% games+12.8% vs expected
Jordan Murray + Bill Almond134 matchesnot enough data
Maurice Steenland + Don Valenti213 matchesnot enough data
Shawn Rasmussen + Daniel Espinoza123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Kovalick
10W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
3
Daniel Espinoza
11W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
Maurice Steenland
6W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Shawn Rasmussen
15W–22L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
Don Valenti
7W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Daniel Roller Nogueira
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75
Jordan Murray
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Rodrigo Vivi
3W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Bill Almond
2W–9L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
2.65
John Maffei
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Joe Alvarez
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
3
Byron Beasley
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.