Teams

MMay

2022 Cap Spring USTA 18 & over · 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-19vs TCrisp 18+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLeigh Magee / Laura Dwyer vs Julie Leon / Andra Kinlaw3-6, 4-6
2022-05-12Lost 01
L#2 SinglesLeigh Magee vs Helen Williams4-6, 2-6
2022-05-05vs IJLake18+Split 11
L#2 DoublesLynne Manweiler / Carol Muth vs Diane Allen / Melissa Liner1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Mulligan / Leigh Magee vs Leslie Corn / Sherry Ingle6-3, 6-3
2022-04-28vs DSKIKO18Lost 01
L#3 DoublesGinger Sluder / Lynne Manweiler vs Sherrie Smith / Erin Conigliaro2-6, 5-7
2022-04-21vs LMcDonell18+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLeigh Magee / Carol Muth vs Noelle Karlawish / Christy Team2-6, 4-6
2022-04-13vs TCrisp 18+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesHeather Mittag / Shannon Powell vs Jill Darnell / Amanda Stevenson6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLynne Manweiler / Leigh Magee vs Lisa Talton / Andra Kinlaw3-6, 3-6
2022-04-07vs TBorsukWon 10
W#3 DoublesLynne Manweiler / Carol Muth vs Patrice Dovel / Carrie Couto6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Kimberly Boyd
published
3.79
Heather Mittag
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Shannon Powell
published
3.67
Carol Muth
published 4
3.63
Ginger Sluder
published 4
3.55
Jamie Martin
published 4
3.50
Leigh Magee
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.50
Rebecca Sears
published
3.50
Lynne Manweiler
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.45
Sarah Mulligan
published
3.33
Laura Dwyer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Magee + Sarah Mulligan1440% games−2.7% vs expected
Leigh Magee + Lynne Manweiler1444% gamesnot enough data
Lynne Manweiler + Heather Mittag224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Boyd
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
4.13
4
Heather Mittag
104W–59L career · 1 line in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
Shannon Powell
15W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Carol Muth
9W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.67
4
Ginger Sluder
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Jamie Martin
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Leigh Magee
45W–74L career · 5 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.50
Rebecca Sears
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Lynne Manweiler
90W–125L career · 4 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.50
Sarah Mulligan
2W–13L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.45
Laura Dwyer
14W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.