Teams

Lakeland Country Club - S. Norman

2022 Polk Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-17vs Beerman - Grieger/EspitiaLost 02
L#1 DoublesKerrie Hall / Sheryl Norman vs Kim Martin / Gwen Wearing-Davis6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarey Campbell / Brandy Lansford vs Laurie Grieger / Karen Volkmann6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-10vs Polk - Alley Cats/TchipanovaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSheryl Norman / Kerrie Hall vs Desiree Tchipanova / Hayley Hurd4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBevin Strickland / Carey Campbell vs Allison Sorenson / Kristin Wyatt4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-03vs Deuces Wild/Beerman - T. LoveLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarey Campbell / Kim Ruthven vs Tiffany Love / Leslie Simmons4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSheryl Norman / Bevin Strickland vs Tiffany Choe / Teresa Osborn0-6, 1-6
2022-04-19vs Polk - Alley Cats/TchipanovaLost 02
L#1 DoublesSandra Campisi / Sheryl Norman vs Hayley Hurd / Desiree Tchipanova7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarey Campbell / Kim Ruthven vs Allison Sorenson / Karen Hogg4-6, 3-6
2022-04-12vs Deuces Wild/Beerman - T. LoveSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSheryl Norman / Kerrie Hall vs Leslie Simmons / Teresa Osborn3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarey Campbell / Anna Clark vs Angela Johnson / Tiffany Choe5-7, 2-6
2022-04-05Lost 02
L#2 DoublesCarey Campbell / Bevin Strickland vs Karen Volkmann / Jennifer Rogers3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSheryl Norman / Brandy Lansford vs KATHERINE FOLSOM / Jo Anne Weaver2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Kerrie Hall
published
2.78
Sheryl Norman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Carey Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.65
Brandy Lansford
published 3
2.65
Lamanda Petcoff
published
2.64
Sandra Campisi
published
2.53
Bevin Strickland
published 3
2.50
Deanna Bayless
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kerrie Hall
38W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%24%76%
3.59
Sheryl Norman
53W–65L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Carey Campbell
15W–43L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Brandy Lansford
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
Lamanda Petcoff
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
Sandra Campisi
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
2.64
3
Bevin Strickland
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
2.53
3
Deanna Bayless
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.