Teams

River Strand Traficante

2022 Sarasota Trilevel Spring Weeknight · 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.80 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-20vs Laurel Oak Monday Night MavensWon 10
W#1 DoublesKim Reiser / Judi Wilson vs Keely Crosby / Yudi Carpenter3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-06-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesKim Reiser / Judi Wilson vs Christina Solomon / Ann Lammers1-0
2022-06-07vs Laurel Oak Monday Night MavensLost 01
L#1 DoublesJudi Wilson / Hattie Grimsley vs Coquina Homer / Jennifer Stroble4-6, 4-6
2022-05-23vs Sarasota - Payne Park/SolomonWon 10
W#1 DoublesKim Reiser / Judi Wilson vs Christina Solomon / Cristina Tomadin6-1, 6-4
2022-05-09vs Laurel Oak Monday Night MavensWon 10
W#1 DoublesKim Reiser / Judi Wilson vs Keely Crosby / Teri Sayre6-2, 6-1
2022-04-11vs Sarasota - Payne Park/SolomonLost 01
L#1 DoublesHattie Grimsley / Kim Reiser vs Elizabeth Mahoney / Cristina Tomadin3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Kim Reiser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Emily Franklin
published 4
3.65
Judi Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Hattie Grimsley
published 4
3.50
Kristen Weston
published
3.47
Marina Hulbert
published
3.25
Sandra Shallcross
published
3.12
Jo Butler
published
2.95
Cynthia DiPalma
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Reiser + Emily Franklin5164% games+12.7% vs expected
Kim Reiser + Kristen Weston2348% games+2.4% vs expected
Kim Reiser + Judi Wilson16853% games+1.2% vs expected
Marina Hulbert + Kristen Weston224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kim Reiser
105W–66L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Emily Franklin
14W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Judi Wilson
135W–101L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Hattie Grimsley
4W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
Kristen Weston
34W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.50
Marina Hulbert
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.47
Sandra Shallcross
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
3.25
Jo Butler
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
Sylvia Sethares-Heyl
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.95
3
Cynthia DiPalma
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.