Teams

Lindsay/Nashville

2025 Combo 18 & Over - Nashville · 7.5 Women - FRI AM & MON PM

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-12vs Grimm/Zwerner/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathleen Carbonari / Tiffini Lindsay vs Heather Gillum / Alicia Santiago-haslag6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarybeth Snodgrass / Kimberly Wilson vs Lynn Blocher / Sandy Tompkins6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCindy Mccullough / Mary Carkhuff vs Georgia Ferrell / Alise Gregory6-2, 6-1
2025-09-05vs Marcum/NashvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesErica Waterbury / Ashley Horvath vs Jill Tidwell / Christie Harrison6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCathy Radig / Cindy Mccullough vs Rhonda Petrin / Ashley Snipes0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Hayslip / Sandra Elliott vs Judith Gallagher / Erica Collins2-6, 3-6
2025-08-22vs McNabb/Hamlin/NashvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesTiffini Lindsay / Kathleen Carbonari vs Tammy Fessler / Ashley Stringfellow6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKimberly Wilson / Marybeth Snodgrass vs Monica Nelson / Carly Mariani1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMary Carkhuff / Jane Ringel vs Jennifer McNabb / Jennifer Meeks1-6, 3-6
2025-08-15vs Hermann/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathleen Carbonari / Tiffini Lindsay vs Hailey Hirst / Angie Wesley6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Carkhuff / Marybeth Snodgrass vs Stephanie Snap / Lisa Yawn6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSandra Elliott / Jane Ringel vs Christy Sallee / Dodson Randolph3-6, 3-6
2025-08-08vs Brooks/Falk/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Wilson / Marybeth Snodgrass vs Corey Ilesco / Rachel Sanders6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTiffini Lindsay / Kathleen Carbonari vs Jennifer Thomas / Shawn Huffman6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJane Ringel / Sandra Elliott vs Julie Dearman / Catherine Schaufele4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women - FRI AM & MON PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Kathleen Carbonari
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Cindy Mccullough
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.63
Marybeth Snodgrass
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.42
Sandra Elliott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Tiffini Lindsay
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Erica Waterbury
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Ashley Horvath
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Mary Carkhuff
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Jane Ringel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Cathy Radig
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.80
Melissa Hayslip
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Carbonari + Tiffini Lindsay9172% games+11.1% vs expected
Cindy Mccullough + Kathleen Carbonari33563% games+5.0% vs expected
Ashley Horvath + Erica Waterbury4250% games+2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Carbonari
89W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
4.08
4
Cindy Mccullough
56W–37L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Marybeth Snodgrass
31W–19L career · 8 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.63
Sandra Elliott
51W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.42
Tiffini Lindsay
41W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Erica Waterbury
23W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Ashley Horvath
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary Carkhuff
13W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
Jane Ringel
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Cathy Radig
6W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Melissa Hayslip
21W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.