Teams

WAL AVERY

2025 FW Ladies 50 & Over summer N · A

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-08Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJill Varrichio / Alice Stacey vs Susie McKenzie / Cindy Aldrete1-6, 2-6
2025-07-25vs WAG ALEXANDERLost 03
L#1 DoublesRose Avery / Karen Brown vs Kathleen Cason / Casey Colvin2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Heitzman / Patsy Winston vs Kelly Rait / Sherry McIlvaine2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Fraser / Cindy Gardner vs Shelby Willborn / Paula Alexander2-6, 0-6
2025-06-27vs TCU SCOTTLost 03
L#1 DoublesRose Avery / Susan Hayslip vs Amy Nelson / Marsha Scott5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Fraser / Cindy Heitzman vs Kari Jordan / Jo Anne Golaz1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAlice Stacey / Cindy Gardner vs Linda Horner / Susie Gilinsky1-6, 2-6
2025-06-13vs WAG ALEXANDERLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatsy Winston / Susan Hayslip vs Kelly Rait / Sona Elliott4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Brown / Jill Varrichio vs Paula Alexander / Kimberly McAnally6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCindy Heitzman / Jan Millhouser vs Michelle Woods / Casey Colvin0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.74
Susan Hayslip
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Patsy Winston
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.44
Rose Avery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Jill Varrichio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Cindy Heitzman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.19
Jan Millhouser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.15
Alice Stacey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.95
Cindy Gardner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Michelle Fagan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rose Avery + Jill Varrichio1637% games−9.4% vs expected
Cindy Heitzman + Patsy Winston134 matchesnot enough data
Alice Stacey + Cindy Gardner033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Hayslip
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
Patsy Winston
6W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
Rose Avery
2W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.44
Jill Varrichio
2W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.42
2.5
Cindy Heitzman
1W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.40
Jan Millhouser
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Alice Stacey
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.15
2.5
Cindy Gardner
1W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Michelle Fagan
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.