Teams

Quail West / Hayes

2025 Collier Adult 18 & Over Spring · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-15vs Cambier / PackoWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Foley / Mark Barrett vs Tyler Wood / Michael Enxing6-3, 6-3
2025-05-13vs Riverstone / MarchandWon 10
W#2 DoublesJames Foley / Mark Barrett vs Ryan Wells / Matt Pittsford6-4, 6-4
2025-05-08vs COLLIER/McWaters/Adult18&over4.0MWon 10
W#3 DoublesMark Barrett / James Foley vs Dale Klaus / James Crombie6-1, 6-2
2025-05-01vs Riverstone / MarchandWon 10
W#2 DoublesJames Foley / Mark Barrett vs Jeremy Lucca / David Townsley6-4, 6-0
2025-04-03vs Cambier / PackoWon 10
W#3 DoublesJames Foley / Heath Rozin vs Thomas Massey / Matthew Lyons6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-27vs COLLIER/McWaters/Adult18&over4.0MLost 01
L#3 DoublesJay Freedman / James Foley vs Jon Fink / Bobby Marks5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Andy Jhanji
published 4
3.93
Fred Weinman
published 4
3.91
Thomas Stefaniuk
published
3.86
Kenneth Connelly
published
3.86
Jay Freedman
published
3.83
Joseph Grabowski
published
3.82
Dan Scardino
published 4
3.79
Gary Dellovade
published 4
3.76
James Foley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Dan Gustafson
published 4
3.69
Juraj Zeman
published
3.65
Heath Rozin
published 4
3.58
Charles Hayes
published 4
3.35
Mark Barrett
published
Lucas Pinzon
published
Matt Edwards
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andy Jhanji + Fred Weinman14361% games+4.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andy Jhanji
26W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Fred Weinman
21W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.93
Thomas Stefaniuk
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
Kenneth Connelly
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
3.86
Jay Freedman
92W–63L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.86
Joseph Grabowski
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Dan Scardino
15W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Gary Dellovade
82W–47L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.79
4
James Foley
126W–72L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Dan Gustafson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Juraj Zeman
32W–5L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Heath Rozin
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Charles Hayes
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
Mark Barrett
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.35
Lucas Pinzon
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Edwards
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rathinivethan Kanjamalai
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.