Teams

Las Mismas - Antonia Adrover

Adult 40 & Over 2026 · Adult Women 40 & Over 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.42 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-11vs Palmas - Ivelisse RiveraWon 21
W#1 DoublesAntonia Adrover / Roxana Kiss vs Ivelisse Rivera / Vanessa Beniquez6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesIdalis Gutierrez / Ruth Rivera vs Ana Leal / Eileen Rodriguez6-3
L#3 DoublesMichelle Santiago / Clara Pares-Pares vs Carmen Jimenez / Vilma Martinez4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-03-28vs Palmas - Ivelisse RiveraLost 13
L#1 DoublesRuth Rivera / Damaris Vega vs Brenda Casse / Elisabeth Cusack5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesIdalis Gutierrez vs Jennifer Garcia6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAntonia Adrover / Joan Rodriguez vs Eileen Rodriguez / Mariely Rivera2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Santiago / Clara Pares-Pares vs Marianna Miraldi Conde / Ana Leal3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-03-15vs Palmas - Ivelisse RiveraLost 13
L#1 DoublesAntonia Adrover / Damaris Vega vs Elisabeth Cusack / Penelope Feliciano4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesIdalis Gutierrez vs Vanessa Beniquez6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Santiago / Marisell Santos vs Tatiana Alonso / Damaris Vale7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesOderaiza Soto Jaume / Ruth Rivera vs Carmen Jimenez / Eileen Rodriguez4-6, 5-7
2026-02-28vs Palmas - Ivelisse RiveraLost 23
W#1 DoublesOderaiza Soto Jaume / Ruth Rivera vs Marianna Miraldi Conde / Vilma Martinez6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesIdalis Gutierrez vs Ana Leal5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAntonia Adrover / Roxana Kiss vs Brenda Casse / Elisabeth Cusack3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesClara Pares-Pares / Damaris Vega vs Eileen Rodriguez / Vanessa Beniquez2-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesMarisell Santos / Michelle Santiago vs Damaris Vale / Mariely Rivera6-4, 6-0
2026-02-21vs Palmas - Ivelisse RiveraLost 14
L#1 DoublesMichelle Santiago / Roxana Kiss vs Penelope Feliciano / Vanessa Beniquez6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesIdalis Gutierrez vs Jennifer Garcia1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAntonia Adrover / Joan Rodriguez vs Tatiana Alonso / Damaris Vale6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRuth Rivera / Oderaiza Soto Jaume vs Carmen Jimenez / Eileen Rodriguez6-3, 6-2
L#4 DoublesClara Pares-Pares / Ada Soto vs Brenda Casse / Elisabeth Cusack4-6, 3-6
2026-02-08vs Palmas - Ivelisse RiveraLost 14
L#1 DoublesRuth Rivera / Roxana Kiss vs Brenda Casse / Elisabeth Cusack2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesIdalis Gutierrez vs Ana Leal3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMarisell Santos / Damaris Vega vs Carmen Jimenez / Eileen Rodriguez3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAntonia Adrover / Oderaiza Soto Jaume vs Penelope Feliciano / Jennifer Garcia6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#4 DoublesMichelle Santiago / Clara Pares-Pares vs Mariely Rivera / Ivelisse Rivera6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women 40 & Over 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Clara Pares-Pares
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.23
Ruth Rivera
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.17
Idalis Gutierrez
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.17
Oderaiza Soto Jaume
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.16
Roxana Kiss
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.12
Antonia Adrover
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.11
Michelle Santiago
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.01
Damaris Vega
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.75
Marisell Santos
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Ada Soto
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 4
Joan Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Rodriguez + Antonia Adrover4257% games+12.6% vs expected
Roxana Kiss + Antonia Adrover3354% games+9.8% vs expected
Oderaiza Soto Jaume + Ruth Rivera7356% games+4.0% vs expected
Roxana Kiss + Ruth Rivera4453% games−0.0% vs expected
Roxana Kiss + Idalis Gutierrez314 matchesnot enough data
Clara Pares-Pares + Ada Soto314 matchesnot enough data
Ruth Rivera + Michelle Santiago123 matchesnot enough data
Clara Pares-Pares + Michelle Santiago213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Clara Pares-Pares
21W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
4.24
4.5
Ruth Rivera
77W–44L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Idalis Gutierrez
8W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
4.17
Oderaiza Soto Jaume
23W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
4.17
Roxana Kiss
18W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Antonia Adrover
115W–58L career · 6 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
4.12
Michelle Santiago
15W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
4.11
4.5
Damaris Vega
9W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
4.01
Marisell Santos
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
3.75
4
Ada Soto
11W–7L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Joan Rodriguez
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.