Teams

SS-LT TEAL

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-27vs PCC SILVERSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAngie Van Wyk / Ann Reidy vs Donna Lollar / Nancy Meyer6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAudrey Simkins / Carol Berg vs Pamela Smith / Carolyn Watson6-7, 2-6
2024-05-25vs DCHS YELLOWLost 02
L#1 SinglesAudrey Simkins vs Breanna McCracken5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Berg / Angie Van Wyk vs Susan Lubeck / Amy Hutchins3-6, 4-6
2024-05-15vs PRC REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesAudrey Simkins / Gina Schulz vs Sharan Swenski / Michele Shaw1-6, 4-6
2024-05-13vs CCV GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesAudrey Simkins / Angie Van Wyk vs Amber Salwisz / Kali Henderson0-6, 0-6
2024-04-29vs CPV REDWon 20
W#2 DoublesCarol Berg / Angie Van Wyk vs Jill Skinner / Karen Lang7-6, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAudrey Simkins vs JoAnn DelMonte6-0, 6-4
2024-04-22vs RRTC ORANGEWon 10
W#2 DoublesAudrey Simkins / Gina Schulz vs Laura Peterson / Sara Beckley6-3, 7-6
2024-04-15vs PRKR REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesAngie Van Wyk / Carol Berg vs Darlene Odean / Jackie Smith2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Caroline Wolf
published 3
2.73
Angie Van Wyk
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.69
Audrey Simkins
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.67
Ann Reidy
published 3
2.52
Carol Berg
published 3
2.50
Brooke Wolf
published 3
2.50
Kimberly Jester
published
Gina Schulz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Audrey Simkins + Angie Van Wyk273246% games−1.6% vs expected
Kimberly Jester + Brooke Wolf134 matchesnot enough data
Brooke Wolf + Carol Berg044 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Jester + Carol Berg123 matchesnot enough data
Brooke Wolf + Angie Van Wyk033 matchesnot enough data
Carol Berg + Ann Reidy213 matchesnot enough data
Carol Berg + Angie Van Wyk033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Caroline Wolf
9W–18L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Angie Van Wyk
77W–106L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Audrey Simkins
49W–88L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Ann Reidy
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Carol Berg
10W–20L career · type A · no lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
2.52
3
Brooke Wolf
9W–20L career · type A · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
2.50
Kimberly Jester
6W–14L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
2.50
Gina Schulz
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.