Teams

Apex:SliceGirls:O'Connor

2025 Summer Tri-Level · 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-06vs Apex:TuckerWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan O'Connor / Susan Clement vs Jodi Tucker / Sarah Parisien7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-15vs Apex:FosterWon 10
W#1 DoublesTana Leonhart / Elisabeth Hardcastle vs Robin Foster / Diana Doyle1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-08vs Apex:CrispoWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan O'Connor / Elisabeth Hardcastle vs Michelle Crispo / Jessica Canatsey7-5, 6-4
2025-07-19vs MP:GreenbaumLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Clement / Liz Stokem vs Deirdre Barton / Nobuko Walek0-6, 0-6
2025-07-08vs CLC:LadyCheetahs:FieldLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan O'Connor / Tana Leonhart vs Logan Neale / Emily Gregory6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-07-05vs Apex:BlairWon 10
W#1 DoublesElisabeth Hardcastle / Tana Leonhart vs Erica Blair Reilly / Margaret Aitken6-4, 6-4
2025-06-30vs Apex:NiermanWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan O'Connor / Elisabeth Hardcastle vs MERYL E Nierman / Lynda Schuepp2-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CLC:LadyCheetahs:Field7070240
2MP:Greenbaum6161226
3Apex:SliceGirls:O'Connor5252773
4Apex:Nierman3434965
5Apex:Tucker2323749
6Apex:Crispo15151065
7Apex:Blair15151167
8Apex:Foster16161375

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Susan Clement
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Elisabeth Hardcastle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Tana Leonhart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Liz Stokem
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan O'Connor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elisabeth Hardcastle + Susan O'Connor314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Clement
35W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Elisabeth Hardcastle
20W–21L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Tana Leonhart
26W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
2.66
Liz Stokem
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan O'Connor
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.