← Teams

SHC-Patrick

2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 2.95 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Katie Macadam
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.09
Megan Mandel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.07
Tom Church-Adams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.05
Gilbert Chiang
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Chris Hartson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Brian Patrick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Greg Arendt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Nina Church-Adams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Stefano Gaggini
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.34
Carmen Timberlake
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Results8 ties
2024-11-23Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesChris Hartson / Carmen Timberlake vs Eric Heredia / Anita Heredia6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnne Gaggini / Stefano Gaggini vs Cynthia Escamilla / Joseph Leaptrott7-6, 6-2
2024-11-15Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesGilbert Chiang / Megan Mandel vs Jingchu Huang / Jing Bennett6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGreg Arendt / Carmen Timberlake vs Kim Bennett / Feifei Chen6-2, 6-2
2024-10-19Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesGilbert Chiang / Katie Macadam vs Katja Daoud / Tim Janes4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrian Patrick / Ivy Lane vs Kathleen Crowley / Scott Myers6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCarmen Timberlake / Brendan Lyon vs Alexander Abrazaldo / Emma Chait6-2, 6-1
2024-10-05Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesGilbert Chiang / Katie Macadam vs Becca Perry / Thomas Croll6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGreg Arendt / Kristie Gunderson vs Michelle Gay / Joseph Comer6-3, 6-2
2024-09-28Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesTom Church-Adams / Nina Church-Adams vs Monte Gonzales / Julia Henry7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesStefano Gaggini / Anne Gaggini vs Jaime Aranda-Michel / Carol Glenn6-1
2024-09-22Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesChris Hartson / Ivy Lane vs Ryker Autajay / Emily Nordstrom6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBrian Patrick / Deena Bothello White vs Jason Tran / Angie Keam7-5, 6-3
2024-09-14Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesBrian Patrick / Megan Mandel vs Kara Petracca / Terry Bennett6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGreg Arendt / Ivy Lane vs Cynthia Escamilla / Joseph Leaptrott2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGilbert Chiang / Katie Macadam vs Samantha Damiano / Knoll Aguilar6-4, 6-3
2024-09-08Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesTom Church-Adams / Nina Church-Adams vs Adrienne Dedelow / Brian Parker6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDeena Bothello White / Chris Hartson vs Jane Nearn / Skip Potter6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Katie Macadam
32W–14L career
0%18%83%
3.22
3
Megan Mandel
37W–27L career
0%57%43%
3.09
3
Tom Church-Adams
32W–25L career
0%58%42%
3.07
3
Gilbert Chiang
46W–22L career
0%69%31%
3.05
3
Chris Hartson
32W–41L career
0%97%3%
2.88
3
Brian Patrick
38W–49L career
0%95%4%
2.87
3
Greg Arendt
16W–16L career
1%98%1%
2.79
3
Nina Church-Adams
12W–22L career
not enough data
—
3
Stefano Gaggini
28W–14L career
2%98%0%
2.74
2.5
Carmen Timberlake
43W–76L career
0%76%24%
2.34

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.