Teams

Long Beach, Azagar

2026 18&Over Men · 5.0

6 players · average NTRP 4.75 / LONG ISLAND REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-26vs LI: Long Beach, Mckenzie/MalikLost 02
L#1 DoublesNasser Ghaffar / Brandon Lee vs Michael Cornelius / Christopher Tham4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesYassine Azagar vs Amani Siddiqui1-6, 1-6
2026-07-19vs LI: Long Beach, Mckenzie/MalikSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAdam Borak / Brandon Lee vs Dillon McKenzie / Michael Cornelius5-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesLuke Lastique vs Amani Siddiqui6-3, 7-5
2026-06-28vs LI: Long Beach, Mckenzie/MalikLost 02
L#1 DoublesNasser Ghaffar / Adam Borak vs Dillon McKenzie / Michael Cornelius3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesYassine Azagar vs Amani Siddiqui1-6, 3-6
2026-06-21vs LI: Long Beach, Mckenzie/MalikLost 02
L#1 DoublesAdam Borak / Nasser Ghaffar vs Dillon McKenzie / Andreas Landgrebe6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesYassine Azagar vs Amani Siddiqui2-6, 1-6
2026-06-16vs LI: Long Beach, Mckenzie/MalikSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLuke Lastique / Brandon Lee vs Amani Siddiqui / Devang Parmar6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesYassine Azagar vs Dillon McKenzie1-6, 1-6
2026-06-04vs LI: Long Beach, Mckenzie/MalikLost 03
L#1 DoublesNasser Ghaffar / Andrew Smith vs Niles Ghaffar / Christopher Tham2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesYassine Azagar vs Dillon McKenzie1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAdam Borak / Brandon Lee vs Amani Siddiqui / Gabriel Lazar2-6, 3-6
2026-05-17vs LI: Long Beach, Mckenzie/MalikLost 02
L#1 DoublesYassine Azagar / Andrew Smith vs Alexander Sherman / Christopher Tham2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLuke Lastique vs Michael Cornelius0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.40 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.67
Luke Lastique
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.56
Adam Borak
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.52
Nasser Ghaffar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.27
Brandon Lee
usually #2 Doubles 27%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 4.5
4.21
Andrew Smith
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.19
Yassine Azagar
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adam Borak + Nasser Ghaffar2346% gamesnot enough data
Yassine Azagar + Nasser Ghaffar033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luke Lastique
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.67
5
Adam Borak
9W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
4.56
Nasser Ghaffar
11W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
4.52
4.5
Brandon Lee
30W–22L career · 11 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Andrew Smith
19W–14L career · 9 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
4.21
5
Yassine Azagar
194W–89L career · 6 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
4.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.