Teams

BING: Net Hackers

2026 18&Over Mixed · 8.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.94 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Evan Vail
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.31
Kathleen Hundley
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
4.17
Benjamin Liu
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.04
Yelena Reporyeva
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
4.02
Jennifer Sweet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.94
Benjamin Kammerman
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.82
Joseph Hommel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.81
Emily Esther
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Theresa Price
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.77
Paulette Weinheimer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
Ewelina Zajac-Holdrege
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.52
Harsh Patel
published 3.5
3.38
Noah Lenkin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Amy Goodman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Luke Kotcho
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Benjamin Liu + Yelena Reporyeva13168% games+11.2% vs expected
Benjamin Liu + Amy Goodman191056% games+6.8% vs expected
Evan Vail + Yelena Reporyeva2450% gamesnot enough data
Evan Vail + Kathleen Hundley404 matchesnot enough data
Yelena Reporyeva + Luke Kotcho404 matchesnot enough data
Benjamin Kammerman + Theresa Price213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Evan Vail
9W–4L career · type S · 10 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
4.41
Kathleen Hundley
40W–20L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Benjamin Liu
61W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.17
4
Yelena Reporyeva
158W–80L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
4.04
Jennifer Sweet
46W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Benjamin Kammerman
49W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.94
Joseph Hommel
38W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Emily Esther
76W–80L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Theresa Price
135W–93L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.79
Paulette Weinheimer
70W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
3.5
Ewelina Zajac-Holdrege
127W–80L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.60
3.5
Harsh Patel
13W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
Noah Lenkin
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Amy Goodman
90W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Luke Kotcho
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.