← Teams

MAC-Nearn

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.19 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Christin Harrington
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Heather Edwards
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
2.95
Tracey Forrest
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.86
Jane Nearn
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Dorothy Cofield
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Elizabeth Large
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.64
Sally Papadimas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.43
Susan Sienko
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-06-18Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesHeidi Cronn / Tracey Forrest vs Julia Henry / Jane Paulsen6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusan Sienko / Elizabeth Large vs Carol Glenn / Joan Randall6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDorothy Cofield / Sally Papadimas vs KC Bildner / Wendi Ouellette6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-16Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesHeidi Cronn / Tracey Forrest vs Chana Dolbey / Cyndi Johnson5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-06-11Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJane Nearn / Heidi Cronn vs Lisa Mayer / Rhonda Baker6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesChristin Harrington vs Lisa McBee6-0, 7-6
L#3 DoublesSally Papadimas / Dorothy Cofield vs Jennifer Trank / Anne Stein-Gray6-3, 6-2
2023-06-03Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesHeather Edwards / Tracey Forrest vs Alma Siri / Stacy Naccachian7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDorothy Cofield / Elizabeth Large vs Carole Bell / Linda Edwards6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanene Larson / Jane Nearn vs Cara Hallock / Jeanne Eyman6-4, 6-1
2023-05-20Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesChristin Harrington / Emily Jones vs Jessica Dalpiaz / Kimberly Downie6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDorothy Cofield / Susan Sienko vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-13Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesEmily Jones / Elizabeth Large vs Robyn Hilden / MICHELLE LY6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesHeather Edwards vs Natasha Rinard6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKristan Summers / Susan Sienko vs Nora Semonsen / Shaun Anderson6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSally Papadimas / Natalie Mesnier vs Abby Hata / Britani Kavanaugh6-2, 6-0
2023-04-22Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesDorothy Cofield / Linda Falvey vs Jennifer Pultz / Kathleen Crowley6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTracey Forrest vs Colleen Atherton6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSarah Schubert / Elizabeth Large vs Kimbra Kasch / Tammy Russum6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesSally Papadimas / Natalie Mesnier vs Kate Maher / Luz Zanavich6-3, 6-3
2023-04-15Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesMarcy Patton / Elizabeth Large vs Mihee Park / Dawan Pandya6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesChristin Harrington vs Jinmi Kemple6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJane Nearn / Dorothy Cofield vs Janice Kuo / Youngmin Byun6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSarah Schubert / Tracey Forrest vs THAO VAN / Na Yung Yu6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Christin Harrington
81W–35L career
0%65%35%
3.56
3.5
Heather Edwards
95W–67L career · type A
2%98%0%
3.21
3.5
Tracey Forrest
16W–14L career · type A
47%53%0%
2.95
3
Jane Nearn
29W–23L career
0%95%5%
2.86
3
Dorothy Cofield
82W–134L career · type A
2%97%1%
2.76
3
Elizabeth Large
19W–48L career
3%97%0%
2.71
3
Sally Papadimas
48W–101L career
9%91%0%
2.64
3
Susan Sienko
28W–77L career · type A
52%48%0%
2.43

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.