Teams

MSIL A18&O 4.0M Kalantzis-Cope Champaign

2026 MSIL Adult 18 & Over -MSIL East League · East MSIL A18&O 4.0M

11 players · average NTRP 3.80 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-07-20vs MSIL A18&O 4.0M Castro-ChampaignLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeffery Roesler / Zach Sehy vs Yongkyu An / Andy Hur6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMark Woolwine vs Collin Carlier0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRyan Hurth / Andrew Hartman vs Patrick Hammie / Francesco Botticella6-7, 2-6
2026-06-16vs MSIL A18&O 4.0M Castro-ChampaignWon 32
L#1 DoublesZach Sehy / Jeffery Roesler vs Collin Carlier / Lijian Zhang4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesGlen Yang vs Vinod Ramakrishnan6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRyan Hurth / Eric Helfer vs Yongkyu An / Elijah Leffelman6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMark Woolwine vs Slava Cazacu0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPatrick Hartman / Nicholas LeVanti vs Sendhil Kumaran / Francesco Botticella6-1, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for East MSIL A18&O 4.0M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Leakey
published 4
Brayden Helfer
published 4
Glen Yang
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.46
Nicholas LeVanti
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Andrew Hartman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Eric Helfer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jeffery Roesler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Woolwine
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Patrick Hartman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ryan Hurth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Zach Sehy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Hartman + Andrew Hartman1440% gamesnot enough data
Eric Helfer + Jeffery Roesler134 matchesnot enough data
Mark Woolwine + Eric Helfer033 matchesnot enough data
Eric Helfer + Ryan Hurth123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Leakey
0W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Brayden Helfer
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Glen Yang
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Nicholas LeVanti
24W–36L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Andrew Hartman
1W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Eric Helfer
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jeffery Roesler
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Woolwine
1W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patrick Hartman
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Ryan Hurth
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Zach Sehy
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.