Teams

RIO DEL ORO 40AW3.5C

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-01vs ANTELOPE COMMUNITY PK 40AW3.5ASplit 22
W#1 DoublesCHRISTINA ELLERMEYER / Julie Peabody vs Susie O'Brien / Tamara Jerd7-5, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJenn Bosley vs Kathi Peterson6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJinny Beaton-Le / Duffy Kelly vs Rosalie Calabrese / Rhona Wu4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer West / Sylvia Ikeda-Shirinzad vs Camille Leyson / Lee Yoshikawa4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Jenn Bosley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.58
Nora Nachtsheim
published
3.56
CHRISTINA ELLERMEYER
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.51
Sonja Jimenez
published
3.45
Heather Reeves
published 3.5
3.43
Julie Peabody
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Serina Fifield
published
3.30
Deborah Tucker
published 3.5
3.27
Jinny Beaton-Le
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Kendra Stanfill
published
3.21
Alice Huang
published 3.5
3.09
Jacqui Deboo
published 3.5
3.03
Sylvia Ikeda-Shirinzad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Duffy Kelly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenn Bosley + CHRISTINA ELLERMEYER10460% games+3.6% vs expected
Jacqui Deboo + Deborah Tucker123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenn Bosley
26W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.60
Nora Nachtsheim
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
3.5
CHRISTINA ELLERMEYER
35W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
Sonja Jimenez
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Heather Reeves
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Julie Peabody
20W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
Serina Fifield
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.40
3.5
Deborah Tucker
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Jinny Beaton-Le
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Kendra Stanfill
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Alice Huang
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Jacqui Deboo
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Sylvia Ikeda-Shirinzad
8W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Duffy Kelly
15W–15L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.