Teams

MPettit/KWainscott (OPRC)

2024 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Women - Wed PM

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-31vs PBurks (Life Time)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesMargy Pettit vs Christina Peterson6-7, 4-6
2024-07-24vs CStaton (Jeff Adams)Split 11
W#1 SinglesJennifer Margulis vs Wanda Thomas6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesShelley Brunker vs Lakesha Johnson2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-07-10vs PBurks (Life Time)Split 11
L#1 SinglesJennifer Margulis vs Emily Weigel3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKrista Wainscott vs Pamela Burks4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-07-01vs CStaton (Jeff Adams)Won 21
L#1 SinglesMargy Pettit vs Beverly Ranger3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 SinglesShelley Brunker vs Cynthia Staton6-2, 2-0
W#3 SinglesPatty Mullins vs Stephanie Stanton6-0, 6-4
2024-06-19vs PBurks (Life Time)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesJill Marcus vs Emily Weigel2-6, 2-6
2024-06-12vs CStaton (Jeff Adams)Won 21
W#1 SinglesKrista Wainscott vs Franchone Bey6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJill Marcus vs Stephanie Stanton6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesPatty Mullins vs Lakesha Johnson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-05-29vs PBurks (Life Time)Won 10
W#3 SinglesKrista Wainscott vs April Porter6-3, 6-2
2024-05-22vs CStaton (Jeff Adams)Won 21
W#1 SinglesJill Marcus vs Coretta Wilson6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesShelley Brunker vs Beverly Ranger2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesPatty Mullins vs Beverly Harrell6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Women - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Courtney Reynolds
published 4.5
3.92
3.83
Krista Wainscott
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.79
Jennifer Margulis
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 4
3.74
Shelley Brunker
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.64
Jill Marcus
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.58
Margy Pettit
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.33
Patty Mullins
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina McWilliams + Krista Wainscott10559% games+8.6% vs expected
Jennifer Margulis + Krista Wainscott5254% gamesnot enough data
Jill Marcus + Margy Pettit033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Courtney Reynolds
23W–12L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Christina McWilliams
46W–31L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Krista Wainscott
190W–89L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Jennifer Margulis
79W–42L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.79
Shelley Brunker
103W–73L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
Jill Marcus
35W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.64
4
Margy Pettit
51W–73L career · 5 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Patty Mullins
87W–68L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.